Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;17(10):1824–1830. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.101344

Table 4. Factors significantly associated with infection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in close contacts in multivariate analysis*.

Factor All close contacts†
Flight passenger contacts‡
Nonflight passenger contacts§
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Age of close contacts, y
>50 Reference Reference Reference
20–50 3.42 (1.56–7.48) 0.002 3.13 (0.40–24.76) 0.280 2.89 (1.23–6.80) 0.015
0–19
7.76 (3.52–17.09)
<0.001

13.33 (1.77–100.22)
0.012

4.97 (2.06–12.00)
<0.001
Relationship to index case-patient
Nonhousehold member Reference NA Reference
Household member
3.83 (2.65–5.53)
<0.001

NA
NA

2.37 (1.58–3.55)
<0.001
Type of exposure to index case-patient
During asymptomatic phase¶ Reference Reference Reference
During symptomatic phase
1.86 (1.23–2.80)
0.003

NA
NA

1.79 (1.09–2.93)
0.021
Exposure duration of close contacts, h
<12 Reference Reference Reference
>12 1.83 (1.25–2.67) 0.002 3.41 (1.49–7.78) 0.004 NA NA

*Variables with p<0.1 in Table 2 were included in multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the model fit for logistic regression. OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available, indicating not included in the final model.
†One dependent variable (infection with pandemic [H1N1] 2009 virus) and 5 independent variables (age of index case-patient, type of exposure to index case-patients, age of close contacts, relationships to index case-patients, and exposure duration of close contacts) were included in multivariate analysis. One independent variable (age of index case-patient) was removed in the stepwise regression equation. The goodness-of-fit test suggested that the logistic regression model fitted well (p = 0.631).
‡One dependent variable (infection with pandemic [H1N1] 2009 virus) and 4 independent variables (age of index case-patient, type of exposure to index case-patient, age of close contacts, and exposure duration of close contacts) were included in multivariate analysis. Two independent variables (age of index case-patient and type of exposure to index case-patient) were removed in the stepwise regression equation. The goodness-of-fit test suggested that the logistic regression model fitted well (p = 0.982).
§One dependent variable (infection with pandemic [H1N1] 2009 virus) and 5 independent variables (age of index case-patient, type of exposure to index case-patient, age of close contacts, relationships to index case-patient, and exposure duration of close contacts) were included in multivariate analysis. Two independent variables (age of index case-patient and exposure duration of close contacts) were removed in the stepwise regression equation. The goodness-of-fit test suggested the logistic regression model fitted well (p = 0.751).
¶Exposed to symptomatic index case-patients before their illness onset or exposed to index case-patients who had subclinical infections.