Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 22;8(3):e1002430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002430

Figure 2. Feedforward neural networks: Evolutionary dynamics of two representative simulations, for.

Figure 2

Inline graphic½ and Inline graphic . Grey scales indicate log counts of colonies with the corresponding value of Inline graphic, Inline graphic (scales on top of the respective graphs) and connection weights (scale on the bottom right-hand side). (A) No switching costs (c = 0). Top graphs: Inline graphic decreases to approximately 0.3. Worker specialization remains at zero. Bottom graphs: incoming connection weights at output node 2 evolve to strong positive values, whereas incoming connections weights at output node 1 evolve to weak positive values (Inline graphic) or oscillate around zero (Inline graphic). (B) With switching costs (Inline graphic). Top graphs: the distribution of workers over tasks and the degree of worker specialisation are both highly variable across colonies. At the end of the simulation, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are both bimodally distributed. Bottom graphs: one of the connection weights (Inline graphic) branches, one branch having positive values and the other, negative values. All other connections show weak positive values or remain very close to zero, all being relatively homogeneous in the population.