Table 1.

The profile of Pfam-predicted protein domain architectures in green plants

Domain architectures	Cra	Ol	Ot	Cv	Vc	Pp	Sm	Os	Zm	Sb	Vv	At	Pt	Gm
Overall predictedb	0.49	0.64	0.59	0.59	0.45	0.42	0.67	0.6	0.47	0.64	0.66	0.75	0.66	0.66
Unique percentagec	0.09	0.05	0.06	0.09	0.12	0.07	0.09	0.15	0.15	0.09	0.12	0.06	0.12	0.10
Single-domain	0.36	0.45	0.41	0.42	0.32	0.30	0.46	0.38	0.35	0.45	0.45	0.51	0.48	0.47
Double-domain	0.09	0.13	0.12	0.11	0.09	0.08	0.12	0.11	0.08	0.11	0.12	0.14	0.12	0.12
Triple-domain	0.03	0.05	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.05	0.06	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.05	0.04	0.04
>= 4-domaind	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.06	0.06	0.02	0.05	0.06	0.06	0.04	0.04

^aSpecies abbreviations are: Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Ol, Ostreococcus lucimarinus; Ot, O. tauri; Cv, Chlorella vulgaris; Vc, Volvox carteri; Pp, Physcomitrella patens; Sm, Selaginella moellendorffii; Os, Oryza sativa; Zm, Zea mays; Sb, Sorghum bicolor; Vv, Vitis vinifera; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Pt, Populus trichocarpa; Gm, Glycine max.

^bThe percentage of proteins with at least one Pfam domain predicted at an E-value cutoff of 10^-2.

^cDenotes the percentages of domain architectures that are unique to each species.

^dThe architectures with 4 or more domains.

Note that overall predicted architectures are categorized into single-domain, double-domain, tripe-domain and > = 4-domain architectures. The proportions of overall predicted architectures in each genome should be the sum of the proportions of these above mentioned four categories.