Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 22;8(3):e1002610. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002610

Table 3. Volatiles from Las-infected and non-infected citrus plants presented as average percentage ±1 standard error (SE) of n-octane equivalents of volatile organic compounds collected from plants' headspace.

Compound RT CAS#* Uninfected (Mean % ± SE) Las-infected (Mean % ± SE) t-value (df) P-value
Sabiene 7.94 3387-41-5 11.0±2.54 15.0±0.67 −0.55 (8) 0.60
β-pinene 8.01 127-91-3 0.01±0.001 0.01±0.001 −0.135 (8) 0.90
Myrcene 8.2 123-35-3 3.0±0.44 3.0±0.23 0.27 (8) 0.79
3-Carene 8.57 13466-78-9 5.0±1.09 2.0±0.08 1.12 (8) 0.39
D-limonene 8.71 5989-27-5 59.0±3.18 27.0±0.79 3.67 (8) 0.01 *
β-ocimene 8.95 502-99-8 6.0±1.01 6.0±0.5 −0.30 (8) 0.77
Linalool 9.83 78-70-6 2.0±0.56 1.0±0.11 0.48 (8) 0.65
Menthatriene (1,3,8-para) 10.14 18368-95-1 0.01±0.001 4.0±0.25 −2.21 (8) 0.06
Methyl salicylate 11.01 119-36-8 1.0±0.21 39.0±2.86 −3.06 (8) 0.02 *
Geranial 12.21 141-27-5 2.0±0.45 0.0±0.0 2.10 (8) 0.07
Methyl anthranilate 13.9 134-20-3 12.0±1.25 0.01±0.05 3.24 (8) 0.01 *
Caryophyllene 14.45 87-44-5 0.01±0.02 3.0±0.22 −2.06 (8) 0.07

Each compound is characterized by its retention time (RT) and major ion.

Bold values indicate a significant difference between treatments (P<0.05). The chemicals which were present in different proportions between Las-infected and non-infected citrus plants are shown. Identification was based on comparisons of retention times with standard and spectral data from Adams, EPA, Nist05 Libraries and synthetic standard comparison.

*: CAS #: Chemical Abstract Service number.