Table 1.
Phase I EDTA venous blood |
Pima #1 | Pima #2 | Pima #3 | Pima #4 | All Pima DATA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 53 | 61 | 59 | 58 | 100** |
Range of CD4 counts* | 2-1297 | 4-1217 | 5-1190 | 7-972 | 4.5-1235 |
Mean CD4 count* | 349 | 334 | 354 | 317 | 318 |
%Similarity to Predicate (%SIM Mean ± SD) |
99.26 ± 5.34 | 99.15 ± 5.35 | 99.64 ± 6.42 | 97.17 ± 5.01 | 98.17 ± 4.57 |
%SIM CV# | 5.38% | 5.40% | 6.44% | 5.16% | 4.66% |
BA Bias* ± 1 STDev (PIMA - PLG) (95% CI of bias mean) |
-14.38 ± 37.9 (-23.8 to -3.9) |
-11.05 ± 42.4 (-21.9 to 0.19) |
-13.6 ± 53.3 (-27.5 to 0.22) |
-22.6 ± 40.3 (-33.2 to -12.0) |
-17.3 ± 36.7 (-24.0 to -10.03) |
BA 95% LOA* | -88.7 to 59.9 | -94.1 to 72.1 | -118.2 to 90.8 | -101.6 to 56.4 | -89.4 to 54.7 |
Statistical analyses across four Pima™ analysers tested in the laboratory during Phase 1 using a fixed 20 mm3 volume of manually pipetted EDTA venous blood and compared against predicate flow cytometry (PLG/CD4). All values, with the exception of N, refer to CD4 cell counts in cells/mm3. BA = Bland-Altman statistical analysis. LOA = limits of agreement. #Precision of Pima™ to Predicate method expressed as %SIM CV.
*cells/mm3
**The average Pima/CD4 value was used for comparison to predicate CD4 where more than two simultaneous Pima values were obtained.