Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 22;7(3):e33340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033340

Table 1. Comparison of the predicted and the experimental amino acid preferences at each of the CDR interface positions.

28-L 29-L 30-L 31-L 32-L
Wji pWji-ti Wji pWji-ti Wji pWji-ti Wji pWji-ti Wji pWji-ti
P3.9 S .61 P4.2 D .42 G3.4 S .65 G4.3 R .85 R4.2 F .43
A2.8 N .56 G2.4 A .28 F2.1 A .57 P3.7 S .68 A2.4 Y .42
S1.4 P .47 M2.1 N .18 S1.7 N .36 N1.0 A .57 Y1.1 H .37
E1.0 F .40 H1.0 T .13 A1.5 H .31 T0.2 H .49 W1.0 N .36
M1.0 A .19 I1.0 R .10 P1.5 P .23 G .30 G0.9 G .25
T0.9 H .17 T0.9 L .08 L .18 N .20 T0.2 T .14
V0.2 E .07 L0.5 H .07 Y .07 Y .07 R .06
M .00 A0.2 I .05 G .02 A .00
P .04 R .01

At each position, the left-hand column shows the amino acid type and the corresponding Wji. All the predicted positive amino acid types (δpWji = 1) and the activation values for sequence preference (pWji) are shown in the right-hand column. The amino acid types shown in bold are the common amino acid types (true positives) shown in both the left-hand and the right-hand columns.