Table 2.
CVLT-II Performance in the Three Study Samples (n = 186)
| CVLT-II Variables | HIV− (n = 43) | HIV+ HAND− (n = 103) | HIV+ HAND+ (n = 40) | pa | db (HIV− vs HAND+) | db (HAND− vs HAND+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item Specific Deficit Indices | ||||||
| Encoding Index | 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) | 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) | 7.0 (5.0, 9.0) | .0024 | −0.79 | −0.49 |
| Consolidation Index | 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) | 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) | .0368 | −0.55 | −0.37 |
| Retrieval Index | 0.4 (0.3, 0.6) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.6 (0.5, 0.7) | .0005 | −0.64 | −0.73 |
| Standard Indices (raw) | ||||||
| Trials 1–5 | 56.0 (46.0, 62.0) | 49.0 (41.0, 59.0) | 44.0 (40.0, 51.8) | .0045 | 0.77 | 0.44 |
| Short Delay Free Recall | 11.0 (9.0, 14.0) | 11.0 (8.0, 13.3) | 9.0 (6.0, 10.0) | .0006 | 0.94 | 0.63 |
| Long Delay Free Recall | 12.0 (9.0, 14.0) | 11.0 (8.0, 14.0) | 9.0 (5.3, 11.0) | .0010 | 0.89 | 0.58 |
| Total Recognition (d′) | 3.1 (2.6, 3.7) | 3.3 (2.5, 3.8) | 2.7 (2.1, 3.3) | .0085 | 0.61 | 0.48 |
| Semantic Clustering | 0.9 (0.2, 2.6) | 1.0 (−0.2, 3.5) | 0.1 (−0.3, 1.0) | .0147 | 0.52 | 0.55 |
| Recall Consistency | 85.0 (79.0, 92.0) | 83.0 (76.0, 90.0) | 78.5 (73.0, 83.0) | .0007 | 0.82 | 0.59 |
| SDFR vs. Trial 5 | −10.0 (−27.3, 0.0) | −11.8 (−30.8, 0.0) | −23.1 (−30.6, −13.0) | .0063 | 0.69 | 0.49 |
| LDFR vs. Trial 5 | −6.7 (−18.8, 0.0) | −8.3 (−25.6, 0.0) | −20.7 (−37.2, −9.1) | .0105 | 0.68 | 0.45 |
| Total Recog Disc vs. LDFR | 33.3 (14.8, 55.0) | 37.0 (17.6, 65.9) | 55.6 (26.5, 90.7) | .0548 | −0.32 | −0.30 |
Note. Data represent medians and interquartile ranges.
a
In all significant pairwise comparisons, HIV− = HAND− > HAND+
b
bias corrected Hedges d effect size estimate.