Table 3.

Classification Accuracy of ISDA and Traditional CVLT indices for Predicting HAND vs. HIV− (n = 186)

CVLT-II Variable	AUC	Standard error	p-value	Sensitivity	Specificity
Item Specific Deficit Indices
Encoding	.719	.083	<.003*	.78	.61
Consolidation	.659	1.66	<.018*	.68	.61
Retrieval	.693	1.01	<.007*	.88	.56
Standard Indices
Total trials 1–5	.710	.023	<.002*	.60	.76
Short delay free recall	.745	.085	<.0003**	.78	.63
Long delay free recall	.730	.077	<.0005**	.70	.65
Total recognition (‘d’)	.684	.304	<.010*	.75	.63

Note. AUC = Area Under Curve.

^*p <.05,

^*p<.001. Cutpoints were selected based on the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity.