Table 4.

Correlations Between ISDA, Traditional CVLT-II, and Other Measures in HAND (n = 40)

	Item-Specific Deficit Approach Variable
Variable	Encoding	Consolidation	Retrieval
Encoding	-	.60**	.63**
Total Trials 1–5s	−.92**	−.62**	−.69**
Trials 1–5 Semantic Clustering	−.51**	−.55**	−.44*
Across-Trial Recall Consistency	−.52**	−.34*	−.51**
Total Learning Slopes	.03	−.15	−.18
Consolidation	.60**	-	.56**
Long-Delay Free Recall	−.75**	−.71**	−.86**
Short-Delay Free Recall	−.72**	−.68**	−.84
Short Delay Free vs. Trial 5a	−.35*	−.39*	−.58**
Long Delay Free vs. Trial 5	−.52**	−.58**	−.70**
Retrieval	.63**	.56**	-
Total Recognition Disc vs. LD Free	.59**	.46	−.64**
Total Recognition Discriminabilitya	−.50**	−.57**	−.68**

Note. Raw scores were used in generating these Spearman’s ρ values.

^aIndices cited as evidence for construct validity in Wright et al. (2009).

^*p <.05,

^**p<.001.