Table 3.
CD1 Mice |
B6 Mice |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Associated Variables/Calculations | E13.5 | E15.5 | E17.5 | E13.5 | E15.5 | E17.5 | |
Mean umbilical artery pressure drop (estimated), mmHg† | P | 3 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Mean umbilical artery blood velocity (estimated; Vmean), mm/s† | Vmean | 25 | 25 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 34 |
Umbilical artery diameter from micro-CT data, mm | d | 0.32 ± 0.02a | 0.46 ± 0.01b | 0.54 ± 0.01c | 0.39 ± 0.02a,* | 0.51 ± 0.02b | 0.50 ± 0.01b |
Umbilical artery flow (calculated), mm3/s | Q = Vmean[π(d/2)2] | 2.0 | 4.1 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 6.8 |
Pressure drop across the arterial tree, mmHg | Parterial | 1.06 ± 0.09a | 1.69 ± 0.19a | 2.97 ± 0.50b | 1.42 ± 0.13a | 1.85 ± 0.10b | 1.28 ± 0.12b,** |
Fetal placental resistance, mmHg·s·μl−1 | Rtotal = P/Q | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
Resistance from micro-CT data, mmHg·s·μl−1 | Rarterial | 0.52 ± 0.04a | 0.41 ± 0.05b | 0.42 ± 0.07b | 0.39 ± 0.04a | 0.30 ± 0.02b | 0.19 ± 0.02c,** |
Capillary and venous resistance, mmHg·s·μl−1 | Rcap+veins = Rtotal − Rarterial | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
Data are means ± SE; n = 7-10 placentas/group. micro-CT, microcomputed tomography.
Estimated from the literature.
Different letters show a significant difference between gestational ages (P < 0.05);
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.001, significant differences between strains at the same gestational age as determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests. No statistical tests were performed on estimated values or calculated values that involved estimates.