Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug 16;67(5):1355–1366. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23128

Table 2.

T2 estimates (mean ± standard deviation) obtained with REPCOM for three circular objects with various numbers of TE points and total number of k-space lines. The data were obtained using a numerical phantom. The diameter of the objects is 6 pixels, the T2’s are (a) 230 ms, (b) 150 ms and (c) 80 ms. These objects were embedded into a 112-pixel diameter circular background. For the various numbers of TE, the same TE coverage was enforced. TE points are equally spaced. Complex Gaussian noise was added to the k-space such that the SNRat TE = 60 ms is about 25 for the object with T2 = 80 ms.

# lines 128 256 512 1024
T2 truth = 230 ms ETL = 4 238.14 ± 8.12 234.14 ± 5.39 231.72 ± 3.98 234.04 ± 2.55
ETL = 8 237.80 ± 7.10 233.90 ± 5.30 231.82 ± 4.24 232.15 ± 3.62
ETL = 16 233.64 ± 7.04 233.85 ± 5.13 233.76 ± 3.44 232.64 ± 2.99

T2 truth = 150 ms ETL = 4 154.63 ± 3.35 151.70 ± 2.71 152.27 ± 1.93 150.89 ± 1.38
ETL = 8 154.45 ± 3.76 151.44 ± 2.81 151.70 ± 1.67 150.11 ± 1.66
ETL = 16 152.62 ± 3.27 151.52 ± 2.30 152.45 ± 1.73 150.37 ± 1.85

T2 truth = 80 ms ETL = 4 81.25 ± 2.50 80.57 ± 1.79 80.27 ± 1.25 80.27 ± 0.88
ETL = 8 81.18 ± 2.01 80.30 ± 1.43 80.37 ± 0.88 80.15 ± 0.69
ETL = 16 80.87 ± 1.68 80.35 ± 1.17 80.64 ± 0.78 80.28 ± 0.68