Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Child Welfare. 2011;90(4):135–156.

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics and Nonparametric Tests For KBT, MACS, and MFG Attendance

Variable Total (n = 225) Child welfare–involved (n = 84) Non-child welfare–involved (n = 141) Significancea
n Mean (SD) Median n Mean (SD) Median n Mean (SD) Median
KBT scale at posttest 157 60.02 (17.60) 54 54 67.00 (21.80) 58.5 103 56.36 (13.68) 51 **
MACS TPS subscale Program satisfaction
 Mid-test 168 34.45 (4.88) 36 64 34.19 (5.06) 36 104 34.63 (4.78) 36 NS
 Posttest 165 35.17 (4.79) 36 56 33.96 (5.35) 35 109 35.80 (4.37) 37 *
MACS RF subscale Relationship with facilitator
 Mid-test 167 37.25 (4.09) 40 64 37.06 (4.42) 40 103 37.37 (3.89) 40 NS
 Posttest 165 37.65 (4.10) 40 55 37.29 (4.43) 40 110 37.84 (3.93) 40 NS
Attendance 223 8.93 (4.91) 10 83 8.53 (4.82) 9 140 9.17 (4.97) 10 NS
 12 sessions 45 8.18 (4.02) 10 16 7.81 (4.13) 9 29 8.38 (4.01) 10 NS
 16 sessions 178 9.12 (5.10) 10 67 8.70 (4.98) 10 111 9.38 (5.18) 10 NS

Note: Numbers may not add up to n = 225 due to missing data.

**

p < 0.01; NS: not significant (p < 0.05)

a

Mann-Whitney tests comparing differences between child welfare and non–child welfare groups.