Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2011;48(1):101–125. doi: 10.1007/s13524-010-0011-2

Table 3.

Two-Level Estimates of the Change in Total BPI Score after the Birth of a Younger Sibling, according to Intention Status of Younger Sibling’s Birth (standard errors in parentheses)

Boysd
Girlse
1 2 3 4 5 6
Intention Status of Younger Sibling’s Birth
 Unintended (either unwanted or mistimed) a 2.26*
(1.12)
1.02
(1.18)
 Unwanted a 1.33
(1.51)
1.15
(1.66)
 Mistimed a 2.90*
(1.28)
.90
(1.31)
Intention Status of Focal Child’s Own Birth
 Unintended (either unwanted or mistimed) a .81
(1.20)
−2.03
(1.25)
 Unwanted a −.07
(1.21)
−1.16
(2.51)
 Mistimed a 1.15
(1.26)
−2.18
(1.31)
Focal Child’s Total BPI score before younger
sibling’s birth
.49***
(.03)
.48***
(.04)
.48***
(.04)
.52***
(.04)
.52***
(.04)
.52***
(.04)
Family Characteristics (before younger sibling’s
birth)
 Family income −.03*
(.01)
−.03*
(.01)
−.03*
(.01)
−.0003
(.02)
.0001
(.02)
.0001
(.02)
 Home ownership −.17
(1.28)
−.02
(1.28)
.01
(1.28)
−2.75*
(1.30)
−2.83*
(1.32)
−2.80*
(1.32)
 Mother living with spouse/partner −1.49
(1.32)
−1.21
(1.33)
−1.23
(1.33)
1.63†
(1.27)
1.63†
(1.28)
1.66†
(1.28)
 Mother living w/parents −.07
(1.91)
−.22
(1.91)
−.16
(1.91)
.85
(1.85)
.98
(1.85)
1.02
(1.86)
 Number of mother’s children in household −.84†
(.58)
−.80†
(.58)
−.80†
(.58)
−.76†
(.57)
−.91†
(.58)
−.91†
(.58)
 Mother’s education −.32
(.29)
−.32
(.29)
−.32
(.29)
−.65*
(.35)
−.61*
(.35)
−.60*
(.35)
 Mother’s Armed Forces Qualifying Test
 score (AFQT)
.32
(.31)
.31
(.31)
.33
(.31)
−.42†
(.32)
−.37
(.32)
−.37
(.32)
 Mother’s age at child’s birth −.44†
(.28)
−.44†
(.29)
−.46†
(.29)
.17
(.30)
.05
(.30)
.04
(.30)
 Race/ethnicity:
  Latinab −.72
(1.70)
−1.01
(1.71)
−.94
(1.71)
1.64
(1.68)
1.62
(1.68)
1.60
(1.69)
  African−Americanb .75
(1.79)
.43
(1.80)
.59
(1.82)
.59
(1.65)
.86
(1.67)
.83
(1.67)
 Region of residence:
  Northeastc −1.21
(1.61)
−1.16
(1.61)
−1.25
(1.61)
−2.28
(1.69)
−2.32
(1.69)
−2.28
(1.70)
  North Centralc −2.69*
(1.46)
−2.82*
(1.46)
−2.86*
(1.47)
1.00
(1.45)
.99
(1.45)
1.01
(1.45)
  Westc .63
(1.54)
.82
(1.54)
.77
(1.55)
1.67
(1.67)
2.77†
(1.67)
2.72
(1.67)
Focal child’s birth order .97†
(.80)
.73
(.82)
.84
(.82)
.69
(.88)
.91
(.90)
.89
(.90)
Characteristics of the focal child’s assessment
 Focal child’s age at assessment
  Spline 1: ages 4-10 .18**
(.06)
.17**
(.07)
.18**
(.07)
.06
(.07)
.05
(.07)
.04
(.07)
  Spline 2: ages 10+ −.03
(.15)
−.01
(.15)
−.03
(.15)
−.14
(.15)
−.16
(.15)
−.15
(.15)
 Temporal order −3.44*
(1.70)
−3.81*
(1.71)
−3.87*
(1.72)
.20
(1.79)
.43
(1.79)
.44
(1.80)
 Total # assessments for this child .30
(.70)
.29
(.70)
.27
(.70)
.80
(.77)
.79
(.77)
.79
(.78)
 Wave .53
(.54)
.68†
(.55)
.70†
(.55)
−.01
(.57)
.15
(.58)
.15
(.58)
Younger sibling same sex as older sibling .73
(1.02)
.66
(1.02)
.75
(1.03)
.23
(1.04)
.29
(1.04)
.28
(1.05)
Intercept 58.36 58.80 58.63 48.05 50.13 50.20
−2 Res Log Likelihood 4469.9 4460.6 4453.2 4432.4 4425.0 4418.2

Notes:

Hp<.10

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001; one-tailed tests except where noted.

a

Reference group is intended.

b

Reference group is non-Hispanic whites (two-tailed tests).

c

Reference group is South (two-tailed tests).

d

N = 492 subjects, 575 observations

e

N = 476 subjects, 569 observations