Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):338–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01311.x

Table 1. Lean Admissions Project at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital.

Step Activities
Lean Team Formation After approval by Medical Director and CEO, 14 person Lean team was formed from various hospital departments:
  • 3 EM residents

  • 3 EM nurses

  • EM pharmacist

  • EM accountant

  • EM business manager

  • ICU nurse

  • Internal medicine resident

  • Ward nurse

  • Medicine consultant

  • Surgical resident

  • UM EM faculty facilitator

Problem Definition Hospital admissions process identified as a problem in current system. Team members defined process characteristics (Figure 1).
Key metrics identified to define the admissions process:
  • Lead time = time physician decision for admit to arrival on ward
    • Average lead time = 13 hours – data collected in small project during week 1 of Lean project
  • Number of patients remaining in the ED at shift change after an admission order was completed

Lean team defined institutional standard for the lead time:
  • Patients should be transferred to an available bed within 1 hour of the decision to admit to an inpatient ward

Project goal defined to move closer to institutional standard:
  • Decrease the number of patients waiting longer than 1 hour by 50% within the next 12 months

Defining the Scope Use of SIPOC tool (Figure 2) to define the scope of the Lean analysis of the admissions process and identify any additional team members to add to the current team.
Value Stream Mapping
  • Current state of process extensively mapped by team
    • Physical flow of patients within institution
    • Information flow among staff within institution
  • “Gemba Waste Walks” performed to observe current process and help identify wasted steps

  • Team identified waste (Table 2) within process and labeled the waste on the Value Stream Map (Figure 3)

Root Cause Analysis
  • “Forced prioritization matrix” was used to determine complex problems within the process that should be examined in detail by root cause analysis

  • Root cause analysis using standard Lean tools (Figure 4):
    • “Five Whys” questions asking method
    • “Ishikawa Fishbone Diagrams”
Future State Planning
  • Brainstorming sessions used to develop solutions

  • New future state developed with goal of creating a single flow system that addressed root causes of problems and eliminated wasted steps (Figure 5)

A3 Summary Document and Implementation Plan
  • Team summarized all aspects of the process visually

  • Detailed implementation plan was constructed to guide each step of the transition phase

  • Team members were assigned tasks to ensure completion of transition to future state

  • Final report submitted to CEO/Medical Director

CEO = chief executive officer; SIPOC = supplies-inputs-process-outputs-customers; ICU = intensive care unit; UM = University of Michigan