TABLE 5.

Combination of the Experiments of Tables 3 and 4

SwissProt entry name	Protein mass	4 114	4 115	4 116	4 117	3 114	3 115	3 116	3 117	CV %
EFTU1_ECO24	46886	1.30	1.31	1.34	1.32	1.31	1.40	1.37	1.30	2.6
TNAA_ECOBW	57462	1.53	1.41	1.45	1.51	1.43	1.44	1.47	1.49	2.6
ODP1_ECO57	107009	1.28	1.36	1.53	1.22	1.38	1.32	1.21	1.35	7.5
ATPB_ECOBW	53377	0.90	0.86	0.89	0.91	1.03	0.89	0.92	0.89	5.7
RPOC_ECODH	168599	0.80	0.88	0.98	0.78	0.78	0.82	0.79	0.87	8.3
EFG_ECOBW	84188	0.90	0.83	0.83	0.84	0.82	0.81	0.89	0.83	3.9
RS1_ECO57	67575	1.06	1.08	1.12	1.13	1.10	1.12	1.14	1.10	2.4
TIG_ECOBW	53351	1.22	1.15	1.16	1.25	1.17	1.20	1.24	1.20	2.9
PFLB_ECOLI	92937	1.36	1.35	1.45	1.40	1.23	1.27	1.33	1.44	5.6
OMPA_ECOLI	40174	0.92	1.37	1.03	0.94	0.88	1.01	0.98	1.07	14.7
ENO_ECOBW	51159	0.83	0.81	0.74	0.92	0.93	0.87	0.92	0.83	7.7
TALB_ECOLI	38683	0.99	1.00	1.07	0.90	1.10	0.91	0.92	0.99	7.5
CH60_ECO24	63372	1.07	0.93	0.92	1.02	0.93	0.94	0.95	1.00	5.6
RBSB_ECOLI	34822	0.73	0.70	0.73	0.73	0.71	0.66	0.71	0.74	3.6
RPOB_ECOBW	162610	0.90	0.84	0.75	0.90	0.85	0.87	0.93	0.83	6.5
RL7_ECO24	14305	0.44	0.38	0.37	0.44	0.39	0.40	0.48	0.40	9.3
HTPG_ECOHS	78151	0.86	0.84	0.74	0.81	0.83	0.81	0.78	0.81	4.5
CLPB_ECOLI	102182	0.49	0.54	0.54	0.47	0.48	0.51	0.49	0.50	5.3
GRCA_ECOBW	15485	1.34	1.41	1.51	1.34	1.32	1.36	1.38	1.40	4.4
ODP2_ECOLI	73893	0.80	0.74	0.74	0.76	0.67	0.76	0.75	0.76	4.9
PUR9_ECO24	61944	0.47	0.42	0.37	0.45	0.42	0.45	0.48	0.41	8.4
6PGD_ECOLI	55742	0.58	0.60	0.50	0.57	0.60	0.59	0.56	0.56	5.8
KPYK1_ECO57	56083	0.70	0.72	0.72	0.66	0.69	0.67	0.67	0.69	2.8
SYGB_ECOBW	82988	0.55	0.59	0.64	0.56	0.60	0.55	0.57	0.59	5.7
SYP_ECOBW	67889	0.33	0.36	0.37	0.33	0.23	0.31	0.34	0.36	13.6
ATPA_ECOBW	59018	0.54	0.49	0.43	0.52	0.52	0.50	0.53	0.49	6.8
GLYA_ECOBW	49782	0.64	0.57	0.55	0.62	0.57	0.57	0.62	0.60	5.5
SYD_ECOBW	70912	0.57	0.57	0.52	0.64	0.54	0.65	0.59	0.58	7.8
RL9_ECO24	17489	0.50	0.45	0.43	0.47	0.54	0.47	0.44	0.46	7.2
PURA_ECOBW	50858	0.60	0.67	0.71	0.60	0.61	0.65	0.63	0.64	6.1
							Average CV %			16.1

Each column has been normalized to the sum of 100. Proteins (471) were found in common between the two experiments. Only the top 30 abundant proteins are shown in this table to illustrate the feasibility of combining individual, deconvoluted protein quantitation of each sample to enable a new, proteomic analysis without the iTRAQ-labeled samples having been run in the same experiment.