Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 3;184(6):E317–E328. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110669

Table 1:

Estimates for model parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis of diacetylmorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment for chronic, refractory opioid dependence

Parameter Estimate Distribution Source
Probability of health state transition
Methadone state
 Remain in methadone state* λ = 0.114, γ = 0.643 Weibull BC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 4 0.923 (0.033) Normal BC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 5 0.965 (0.042) Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 6 0.952 (0.041) Normal
 Transition to relapse state 95.9% Beta BC MMTOS
 Transition to abstinence state 4.1%
Diacetylmorphine state
 Remain in diacetylmorphine state* λ = 0.061, γ = 0.761 Weibull NAOMI
  Multiplier: Episode 4 0.923 (0.033) Normal BC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 5 0.965 (0.042) Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 6 0.952 (0.041) Normal
 Transition to relapse state§ 37.0% Dirichlet Rehm et al.44
 Transition to abstinence state 22.4%
 Transition to methadone state 40.7%
Relapse state
 Remain in relapse state* λ = 0.091, γ = 0.672 Weibull BC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 4 1.220 (0.048) Normal BC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 5 1.350 (0.060) Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 6 1.442 (0.056) Normal
 Transition to treatment state 1 Fixed
Abstinence state
 Remain in abstinence state* λ = 0.089, γ = 0.797 Weibull Termorshuizen et al.12
 Transition to relapse state 1 Fixed
Transition to death
Abstinence state, HIV negative See Appendix 1, Table A1 Fixed Statistics Canada32
Abstinence state, HIV positive, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD) 1.47 (1.07, 2.01) Normal ATCC45
Relapse state, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD) 30.063 (3.169) Normal Spittal et al.33
Methadone state, relative risk, mean (SD) 0.350 (0.087) Normal Caplehorn et al.6
Diacetylmorphine state, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD) 9.70 (0.17) Normal Rehm et al.34
HIV seroconversion**
Treatment state, mean (SD) 0.0028 (0.0010) Beta Bayoumi et al.38
Relapse state, mean (SD) 0.0364 (0.0146) Beta
Abstinence state, mean (SD) 0.0007 (0.0001) Beta
QALYs††
Methadone or diacetylmorphine state 0.852 MVN NAOMI
Relapse state 0.750 MVN NAOMI
Abstinence state, HIV negative See Appendix 1, Table A15 Beta Johnson et al.46
Abstinence state, HIV positive, mean (SD) 0.77 (0.19) Beta Anis et al.47
Monthly costs,‡‡Can$
Drug treatment
 Methadone, mean (SD) 329.38 (24.46) Normal NAOMI, BC PNET
 Diacetylmorphine, mean (SD) 1415.21 (25.68) Normal NAOMI
 HIV infection 28.30 Fixed Wood et al.48 and Krentz et al.49
 Hepatitis C virus infection 673.82 Fixed Butt et al.50 and BC PNET
Methadone or diacetylmorphine state§§
 Health resource utilization, HIV positive 72.10 MVN NAOMI
 Criminal involvement 950.52 MVN NAOMI
 Criminal charges 398.82 MVN NAOMI
Relapse state§§
 Health resource utilization, HIV positive 695.98 MVN NAOMI
 Criminal involvement 8981.28 MVN NAOMI
 Criminal charges 590.05 MVN NAOMI

Note: ATCC = Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration, BC MMTOS = British Columbia Methadone Maintenance Treatment Outcome Study, BC PNET = British Columbia PharmaNet database, MVN = multivariate normal, NAOMI = North American Opiate Medication Initiative, QALY = quality-adjusted life-year, SD = standard deviation. Appendix 1 is available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.110669/-/DC1.

*

Parameter estimates provided for the time to discontinuation of each health state represent the shape (γ) and scale (λ) parameters of the Weibull distribution. From estimated survival functions, at 12 months, the probability of remaining in methadone treatment was about 47%, 68% in diacetylmorphine treatment, 62% in relapse and 52% in abstinence.

Derived from Cox proportional hazards frailty models on successive episodes of treatment and relapse.36 All multipliers presented are hazard ratios and corresponding standard errors.

Change in duration of successive diacetylmorphine episodes was assumed to be equivalent to change in duration of successive methadone episodes.

§

Included transition to methadone state (n = 379) and other treatment (n = 28) among all participants alive at the end of follow-up and not lost to follow-up (n = 1001).

Sex-specific estimates used in the model for HIV-negative individuals in the abstinence state are presented in Appendix Table A7. For monthly probabilities of death in the abstinence–HIV positive, diacetylmorphine and relapse states, we multiplied base probabilities by state-specific standardized mortality ratios; for monthly probabilities of death in the methadone state, we multiplied the base probabilities by standardized mortality ratios and relative risks.

**

Calculations and specific references for state-specific HIV seroconversion are shown in Appendix Table A5.

††

Calculations are shown in section A2.3 in Appendix Tables A13–A16.

‡‡

Calculations are shown in section A2.2 in Appendix Tables A8–A14.

§§

For all costs related to health resource use, criminal involvement and criminal charges, trial-based data on utilization/frequency of events was multiplied by unit costs from several sources, detailed in Appendix Table A8. Presented state-specific costs are estimated mean values, given the mean age, HIV status and sex mix of participants in the NAOMI study. Costs were a function of each of these parameters in the cohort simulation model.