Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 3;184(6):E317–E328. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110669

Table 2:

Estimated cost-effectiveness of diacetylmorphine compared with methadone in the treatment of chronic, refractory opioid dependence

Time horizon; treatment Cost, Can$ × 1000, mean (95% CI) Cost component, % of total QALYs, mean (95% CI) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Can$ × 1000 per QALY gained, mean (95% CI)
Treatment Health resources utilization Criminal activity and charges
1 year
Diacetylmorphine 85.9 (63.8–116.7) 17.7 4.2 78.1 0.86 (0.83–0.90) CS (CS–485.8)
Methadone 87.7 (63.9–119.8) 3.7 6.5 89.8 0.85 (0.81–0.89)
5 years
Diacetylmorphine 387.7 (293.4–511.6) 12.3 8.2 79.5 3.43 (3.26–3.59) CS (CS–103.4)
Methadone 418.3 (297.0–579.0) 2.5 11.2 86.2 3.32 (3.14–3.47)
10 years
Diacetylmorphine 696.0 (504.9–960.0) 10.4 11.1 78.5 5.61 (5.29–5.90) CS (CS–78.2)
Methadone 743.8 (515.1–1059.7) 2.3 14.0 83.8 5.39 (5.08–5.67)
Lifetime
Diacetylmorphine 1096.1 (724.1–1707.2) 9.3 14.1 76.7 7.92 (7.32–8.53) CS (CS–122.3)
Methadone 1137.6 (736.8–1776.5) 2.1 16.7 81.2 7.46 (6.91–8.01)

Note: CI = credibility interval, CS = cost-saving, QALY = quality-adjusted life-year.