Table 3.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses of variables (n = 91)
| Criterion
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction
|
Support
|
Distress
|
Affective Complexity
|
|||||||||
| Step | β | ΔR2 | Step | β | ΔR2 | Step | β | ΔR2 | Step | β | ΔR2 | |
| Predictors | ||||||||||||
| Minority status | 1 | −.195 | .12*** | 1 | .073 | .00 | 1 | .053 | .05* | 1 | −.095 | .06* |
| SES | 2 | .051 | .13*** | 2 | .120 | .11*** | 2 | −.104 | .16*** | 2 | −.346 | .17*** |
| Ego development (ED) | 3 | .238 | .02 | 3 | .136 | .00 | 3 | −.301 | .03† | 3 | .070 | .00 |
| Global symptoms (GS) | 4 | −.219 | .07** | 4 | −.552 | .28*** | 4 | .356 | .15*** | 4 | −.115 | .03† |
| Anger expression (AE) | 5 | −.269 | .03† | 5 | −.217 | .01 | 5 | .270 | .02† | 5 | −.165 | .00 |
| Maternal substance abuse (MSA) | 6 | −.435 | .07*** | 6 | −.313 | .04* | 6 | .415 | .07*** | 6 | .200 | .03† |
| Interaction terms | ||||||||||||
| ED × GS | 7 | −.131 | .01 | 7 | −.191 | .03* | 7 | .201 | .02† | 7 | −.221 | .03* |
| ED × AE | 8 | .040 | .00 | 8 | −.002 | .00 | 8 | −.106 | .00 | 8 | .041 | .00 |
| ED × MSA | 9 | −.270 | .03* | 9 | −.168 | .01 | 9 | .256 | .03* | 9 | −.033 | .00 |
| Total R2 | .48 | .49 | .53 | .34 | ||||||||
Note: As recommended by Aiken and West (1991), unstandardized regression coefficients are reported because standardized coefficients are inappropriate with interaction terms; also, interaction terms in these analyses involve centered variables.
†
p <.10.
*
p <.05.
**
p <.01.
***
p <.001.