Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 28;7(3):e34484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034484

Table 1. Termite mortality after 11 d when exposed to Metarhizium anisopliae in planar arena.

Conidia per g of sand Average mortality (%) Hazard ratio of death Lower and upper 95% C.I. Pairwise comparison¤
0 (Control) 5.67 0.107 (0.065 –0.180) a
2×102 5.67 0.109 (0.065 –0.180) a
2×103 7.33 0.140 (0.089 –0.221) ab
5×103 13.67 0.278 (0.196 –0.395) bc
1×104 13.67 0.274 (0.192 –0.389) bc
2×104 21.33 0.455 (0.337 –0.614) cd
3×104 30.00 0.669 (0.511 –0.877) de
4×104 32.33 0.713 (0.547 –0.929) de
5×104 42.33 0.976 (0.763 –1.250) ef
6×104 42.33 1 (Ref) N /A ef
7×104 45.33 1.150 (0.903 –1.460) fg
8×104 51.00 1.260 (0.994 –1.590) fg
9×104 57.33 1.600 (1.270 –2.010) gh
1.0×105 69.00 2.170 (1.740 –2.710) hi
1.1×105 79.00 2.810 (2.260 –3.490) ij
1.2×105 87.33 3.790 (3.050 –4.700) j
2.0×105 95.67 5.360 (4.310 –6.670) k

The sand introduced into the arenas was treated with a solution of 0.05% Tween80 containing a suspension of M. anisopliae conidia ranging from 0 to 2.0×105 conidia/g.

The hazard ratio of death is displayed using 6×104 c/g (≈LD50) as a reference point.

¤

Pairwise comparison of survivorship using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model (α = 0.05, modified with the Holm-Bonferroni method). The same letter indicates no significant difference of ratio of death among treatments (300 termites per treatment).