Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 28;7(3):e34452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034452

Table 2. Geographic distribution of C. trachomatis specimens according to three different strain typing methods, and genetic diversity within each area.

Geographic area Finnmark1 Tromsø Trondheim Total2
No of chlamydia specimens 80 80 88 248
No of STs3 21 27 28 50
No of novel STs 10 18 14 31
No of cases with novel STs 33 34 34 101
ST variation4 (95% CI) 0.26 (0.17–0.40) 0.34 (0.23–0.44) 0.32 (0.22–0.41) 0.20 (0.15–0.25)
% novel STs5 (95% CI) 47.6 (26.3–69.0) 66.7 (48.9–84.5) 50.0 (31.5–68.5) 62.0 (48.6–75.5)
No of genovars6 D–K 6 7 7 8
No of ompA genotypes7 7 10 9 11

CI: Confidence interval.

1

C. trachomatis specimens from either the high school study (n = 60) or routine clinical samples in the laboratory (n = 20).

2

The numbers reflect the results for all 248 specimens and do not necessarily equal the sum of each row.

3

Sequence types of C. trachomatis detected by multilocus sequence typing.

4

Number of STs identified in an area divided by number of chlamydia specimens in the area.

5

Percentage novel STs in an area of total number of STs in the area.

6

Genovar D–K of C. trachomatis inferred from ompA sequencing.

7

Genotypes of C. trachomatis detected by ompA sequencing.