Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Model. 2011 Nov 30;18(6):2831–2843. doi: 10.1007/s00894-011-1307-x

Table 3.

Distances between heteroatoms in FPR1 agonists and carbonyl carbon atoms in nearest residues of the FPR1 binding site for docking poses and molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories for ligand–receptor complexes

Compound Position of the atoms in the ligand–receptor complex Distance (Å)
Docking pose MD trajectorya
AG-11/03 SCH3 sulfur – Ala264 4.80 5.0±0.9
OCH3 oxygen – Leu198 4.66 4.9±1.0
Sulfur – Gly202 5.86 5.6±1.1
AG-11/05 OCH3 oxygen (ester) – Val160 5.90 6.1±1.0
OCH3 oxygen (attached to benzimidazole) – Leu198 3.78 4.1±0.8
Sulfur – Ala261 4.42 4.6±0.9
AG-11/10 OCH3 oxygen – Cys98 3.85 4.0±0.7
CH3CONH nitrogen – Leu198 4.28 4.1±0.8
Sulfur – Val160 6.70 6.3±1.0
a

The ligand–receptor complexes were heated to 310 K for 20 ps, structural data were collected for the next 2 ns at 310 K, and the MD trajectories obtained by HyperChem were analyzed, as described under Materials and methods. Average distances are indicated with their standard deviations over the MD trajectory