Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar;18(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.11.003

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Covariates That Could Predict EF >42% or EF >22%

HF Patients with EF >42%
HF Patients with EF >22%
OR (95% CI) P Value OR (95% CI) P Value
Univariate log. regression
 GSTP1 0.98 (0.97–0.99) .001 0.98 (0.98–0.99) .0001
 proBNP 0.99 (0.997–1) .01 0.99 (0.99–1) .03
 LVMI 0.98 (0.93–1.03) .38 0.99 (0.098–0.99) .03
 Age 1.02 (0.96–1.08) .54 1.04 (1.01–1.08) .006
 PCWP 0.99 (0.97–1.02) .32 0.98 (0.94–1.02) .35
 PVR 0.94 (0.71–1.25) .12 1.08 (0.8–1.4) .62
 CI 1.1 (1.001–2.53) .06 1.02 (0.5–1.9) .96
 Creatinine 1.31 (0.81–2.13) .27 1.74 (0.9–3.4) .1
Multivariate log. regression
 GSTP1 0.98 (0.97–0.99) .002 0.99 (0.98–0.99) .0001
 ProBNP 0.99 (0.99–1) .02 1 (0.99–1.001) .94
 LVMI 0.99 (0.99–1.02) .06
 Age 1.04 (0.98–1.2) .18

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.