Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 23;73(4-2):814–828. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.026

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sound Causes Upward FP Deflections in V1 that Are Accompanied by Cellular Hyperpolarizations

(A) The grand average ± SEM of FP responses recorded in lightly anesthetized (n = 12) and awake, head-restrained (n = 3), and freely moving (n = 6) mice. Dashed lines are stimulus onsets.

(B) Left: examples of individual FP recordings (black) aligned with the onset of a noise burst, averaged over 50 presentations (red). Right: change of spectral content over time relative to the baseline (1 s) of the averaged FP response.

(C) Same plot as in B for individual trials (left) and intertrial coherence, measured as the phase-locking factor between trials (right). Note the prominent gamma band after the SH.

(D) Examples of simultaneous FP and whole cell (WC) recordings of the Vm from a L2/3P in V1. Magnified SHs are depicted in gray.

(E) Overlaid FP and Vm responses of a L2/3P in an awake mouse. Upward FP responses reflect hyperpolarizations.

(F) Intensity response of SHs. Examples of Vm (top) and FP (bottom) responses for different sound intensities. The response was barely detectable for 48 dB SPL sound intensity and quickly reached a saturating plateau for sound intensities > 64 dB SPL (p < 0.05 for post hoc tests). Error bars in right plot are SEMs. The gray band depicts the detection level (>baseline ± 2 SD).

See also Figure S1.