Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 23;9(1):1–23. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9010001

Table 1.

Fit statistics from the latent class analyses.

Number of classes Log-likelihood (L2) BIC-L2 AIC-L2 Npar/DF G2 L2/df p-value a %ERb
1-class 2548.2 5148.7 5112.4 8/238 880.3 10.71 0.0000 0.000
2-class 2216.3 4543.7 4466.6 17/238 472.1 9.31 0.0000 0.087
3-class 2060.1 4290.3 4172.3 26/229 159.8 8.99 0.9829 0.081
4-class 2038.6 4306.0 4147.1 35/220 116.7 9.26 1.0 0.800
5-class 2022.1 4332.0 4132.2 44/211 83.8 9.58 1.0 0.794
6-class 2014.8 4376.1 4135.5 53/202 69.1 9.97 1.0 0.790
7-class 2009.2 4423.9 4142.4 62/193 57.9 10.41 1.0 0.790
8-class 2005.1 4474.4 4152.1 71/184 49.6 10.89 1.0 0.787
9-class 2001.3 4525.8 4162.7 80/175 42.2 11.44 1.0 0.785
10-class 1997.4 4576.9 4172.8 89/166 34.4 12.03 1.0 0.784

Note: a Significance values can be computed using the Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood-ratio test (Lo et al., 2001) allowing for direct tests between models with ‘k’ and ‘k-1’ classes. Low p-values indicate the model with one less class should be rejected in favor of the estimated model. b %ER = percent error reduction in L2 when model is pitted against the null model of complete independence (one-class model).