TABLE 2.
Year | Tissue | Laser characteristics | Fluence | Irradiance | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1979 | wound closure | He-Ne laser4 J/cm2 | Wound healing best at 45 mW/cm2; least at 12.4 mW/cm2 | Ginsbach 1979 | |
2001 | Induced heart attacks in rats | 810 nm laser; 2.5 to 20mW/cm2 ; | Reductions of infarct size maximum at 5mW/cm2 Lower effects both at 2.5mW/cm2 and 20mW/cm2 |
Oron et al. 2001 | |
2005 | Mouse pleurisy induced by Carrageenan | 650nm laser; 2.5 mW in 0.08 cm2; 3 J/cm2, 7.5 J/cm2, and 15 J/cm2 | Inflammatory cell migration reduction most at 7.5 J/cm2; Less at 3 and 15 J/cm2 | Lopes-Martins et al. 2005 | |
2007 | Healing of pressure ulcers in mice | 670nm LED; 5 J/cm2 at 0.7, 2, 8 or 40mW/cm2 | Healing significant improved only at 8mW/cm2;Less at 0.7, 2, and 40 mW/cm2 | Lanzafame et al. 2007 | |
2007 | Full thickness dorsal excisional wound in BALB/c mice | a single exposure from 635, 670, 720 or 820nm filtered lamp; 1, 2, 10 and 50 J/cm2; 100 mW/cm2 10, 20, 100 and 500 seconds | Healing effect best at 2 J/cm2 for 635nm light; worse at 50 J/cm2 for most wavelengths compared to no treatment | 820nm was the best wavelength | Demidova-Rice et al. 2007 |
2007 | Inflammatory arthritis induced by zymosan in rats | 810-nm laser; 3 and 30 J/cm2; 5 mW/cm2 and 50 mW/cm2 | 30 J/cm2 was better than 3 J/cm2 at 50mW/cm2 | 3 J/cm2 has effective at 5mW/cm2 but not 50mW/cm2 | Castano et al. 2007 |