Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 26;9(2):370–390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9020370

Table 5.

Comparison of Phased Approaches for Stressor-Based and Effects-Based Cumulative Risk Assessment as described by Menzie et al. [61].

Phase Stressor-Based Approach Effects-Based Approach
Step 1 - develop conceptual model describing stressors and ways they cause effects
- identify receptors and end points affected by stressors individually and in combination
- establish common denominators for evaluation by identifying common receptors and end points
- develop conceptual model describing important stressors and the ways they cause critical effects
- establish common denominators for evaluation by identifying common receptors and end points
Step 2 - screen stressors of interest to determine which need to be included in the assessment and which may act in combination - screen potential stressors to identify an appropriate and manageable number to characterize the problem adequately
Step 3 - appraise individual effects of stressors along with combinations of other stressors as part of the conceptual model
- determine how the combined effects of multiple stressors affect end point
- incorporate psychosocial stressors by characterizing the environmental and cultural and socioeconomic attributes of exposed groups
- appraise the individual effects of individual stressors to determine whether one or a few stressors are predominant
Step 4 - assess the combined effect of stressors, taking into account potential interactions among the stressors and effects - assess the combined effects of stressors without considering the potential for interactions
Step 5 - not applicable - gauge the combined effect of stressors, taking into account potential interactions among the stressors and effects