Table 4. Statistical results of the potential D-box and KEN-box substrates predicted from the microkit proteins.
| Organism | MiCroKit proteins | D-box | E-ratioc | p-value | KEN-box | E-ratio | p-value | ||
| Pro.a | Boxb | Pro. | Box | ||||||
| S. cerevisiae | 266 | 74 | 93 | 1.92 | 5.93E-09 | 58 | 70 | 2.53 | 1.31E-11 |
| C. elegans | 95 | 30 | 37 | 2.04 | 5.24E-05 | 21 | 23 | 3.41 | 3.55E-07 |
| D. melanogaster | 112 | 50 | 80 | 2.19 | 3.19E-09 | 30 | 35 | 3.86 | 2.67E-11 |
| M. musculus | 132 | 52 | 83 | 2.00 | 1.22E-07 | 24 | 32 | 2.83 | 3.17E-06 |
| H. sapiens | 677 | 215 | 315 | 1.68 | 3.25E-16 | 101 | 138 | 2.15 | 1.51E-13 |
| Total | 1,282 | 421 | 608 | 1.78 | 5.50E-36 | 234 | 298 | 2.62 | 1.18E-42 |
a
Pro., the number of predicted D-box or KEN-box proteins;
b
Box, the number of predicted D-boxes or KEN-boxes;
c
E-ratio, enrichment ratio, the MiCroKit D-box or KEN-box proportion in comparison with the proteomic proportion.