Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mot Behav. 2012 Feb 24;44(2):69–85. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.650735

Table 2.

The group averages of individual finger forces (N)

Day Finger Experiment Predicted from optimization using different cost functions
C1 C2 C7 F1 F2
Day 1 Index 4.99±1.05 4.99±1.05 4.72±1.13 4.71±0.98 4.50±0.85 3.74±0.82
Middle 3.20±0.51 3.20±0.51 3.65±0.82 3.65±0.81 4.05±0.47 4.70±0.44
Ring 3.82±0.93 3.82±0.93 3.79±1.05 3.81±1.02 3.74±0.40 4.70±0.44
Little 3.61±0.52 3.61±0.52 3.46±0.70 3.44±0.68 3.34±0.63 2.47±0.78
Day 2 Index 4.45±1.12 4.24±1.10 4.45±1.12 4.22±1.07 4.00±0.90 3.25±0.86
Middle 2.92±0.61 3.10±0.66 2.92±0.61 3.24±0.75 3.62±0.39 4.29±0.34
Ring 3.34±0.83 3.61±0.78 3.34±0.83 3.43±0.85 3.36±0.32 4.29±0.34
Little 3.33±0.63 3.10±0.58 3.33±0.63 3.15±0.67 3.05±0.73 2.2±0.94
Day 7 Index 4.38±0.95 4.30±1.00 4.28±1.11 4.38±0.95 4.03±0.81 3.27±0.78
Middle 3.06±0.60 3.04±0.69 3.19±0.89 3.06±0.60 3.59±0.37 4.23±0.33
Ring 3.23±0.74 3.47±0.74 3.27±0.83 3.23±0.74 3.28±0.34 4.23±0.33
Little 3.12±0.65 2.99±0.59 3.05±0.68 3.12±0.65 2.9±0.72 2.06±0.91

Average data over all trials in each subject/day; averages over all subjects with standard deviation presented. The experimental data and the values predicted from the application of the cost function Ci at day i are boldfaced.