Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;26(4):1372–1386. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-193466

Table 1.

Comparison of screen stages for shRNA and siRNA screens

Screen stage shRNA siRNA
1. Cell-based optimization Define MOI for cell line Establish transfection conditions
Identify +ve, −ve controls Identify +ve, −ve controls
Make virus for individual shRNAs siGLO and nontargeting control
2. Assay development Establish screen phenotype Define assay parameters
Verify phenotype of controls in dilution of pools Robustness, Z′ factor
Develop automation
Identify analysis rules
3. Screen Transduce cells with library pool Primary SMARTpool screen
Select with GFP/puromycin Duplicate or triplicate technical replicates
Assay: select reference population Analysis ongoing
Freeze cells, extract genomic DNA
Amplify gDNA and NGS analysis
4. Bioinformatics Process NGS data Statistical analysis
Statistically rank shRNAs Define hit list
5. Validation Identify individual shRNA hits Secondary validation screen
Make virus for all constructs per target Deconvolute SMARTpools
Rescreen using same assay Same assay or different assay
Verify knockdown Additional cell lines
6. Bioinformatics Pathway analysis Pathway analysis
Data mining Data mining
Tertiary analysis, more cell lines, different assays

shRNA and siRNA screen stages broken into chronological order. Stages can take different times depending on the assay and quantitation method. Bioinformatics analysis is an ongoing effort that intervenes in the screen process at several points. Central to each screening platform is identification of robust positive (+ve) and negative controls (−ve). For the siRNA platform, siGLO, a fluorescent reporter, is used to indicate transfection efficiency.