Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 1;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-93

Table 3.

Global model building summary: PENS prediction of utilization of interconceptional care

Model specification Number of observations Wald Chisq Df P value*
Predisposing Only (Model 1) 352 37.6514 27 0.0835

Enabling Only (Model 2) 344 20.4951 12 0.0583

Needs Only (Model 3) 442 3.8 6 0.7037

Systems Only (Model 4) 425 2.69 3 0.4419

Full Anderson Behavior Model (Model 5) 265 49.0046 48 0.4326

Individual Models

 Insurance 442 3.1777 3 0.3650

 Income 359 5.8305 3 0.1202

 Social support 425 1.2121 3 0.7501

 Neighborhood safety 424 3.1148 3 0.3743

 Competing demands 442 0.3698 3 0.9464

 Has a provider 425 2.6900 3 0.4419

 Age 442 8.5929 3 0.0352

 Race/ethnicity 432 1.9461 3 0.5837

 Marital status 440 2.8838 3 0.4099

 Education (HS grad) 442 0.1420 3 0.9864

 Education (Less than HS) 442 2.8830 3 0.4100

 Family size 437 0.6410 3 0.8870

 Drug use 360 6.2302 3 0.1009

 Alcohol use 360 1.1814 3 0.7575

 Smoke 432 22.6342 3 < 0.0001

 Physical health problems 442 1.8854 3 0.5965

 Mental health problems 442 2.1730 3 0.5373

*This is the p-value associated with the specified Chi-Square statistic. Here, the null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between the any of the predictor variables and the outcome.