Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 6;104(7):528–540. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs027

Table 4.

MicroRNAs selected most frequently in classifiers compared with expected frequency*

MiR No. of times assessed, npl (%) No. of times selected in classifier, ncl (%) P§ Cancer type
All miRs in patients with poor outcome
    let-7 244 (2.46) 16 (6.23) <.001 Gastric, HCC, leukemia, lung, melanoma, NHL, ovarian
    21 34 (0.34) 5 (1.95) .0018 Astrocytoma, colon, lung, ovarian
    100 26 (0.26) 4 (1.56) .0043 Gastric, HCC, lung
    125 71 (0.72) 6 (2.33) .0084 HCC, gastric, neuroblastoma
MiRs with increased expression in patients with poor outcome
    21 34 (0.34) 5 (4.72) <.001 Astrocytoma, colon, lung, ovarian
    20 47 (0.47) 4 (3.77) .0046 Colon, leukemia, NHL
    155 26 (0.26) 3 (2.83) .0063 Lung, melanoma
    193 55 (0.56) 4 (3.77) .0078 Melanoma
MiRs with decreased expression in patients with poor outcome
    let-7 244 (2.46) 7 (9.59) .0017 Gastric, lung, HCC, ovarian
    30 135 (1.36) 5 (6.85) .0028 Astrocytoma, HCC, lung
    29 94 (0.95) 4 (5.48) .0046 Endometrial, NHL
    7039 1 (0.01) 1 (1.37) .0073 Ovarian
*

For studies assessing overall survival as an outcome with platform data available (n = 27). HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma; miR = microRNA; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

From 9900 total miRs across 27 platforms.

Percentages calculated for 257, 146, and 73 of the selected miRs in the all, increased expression, and decreased expression sets, respectively (for 38 selected miRs, it was not specified whether their expression was increased or decreased in patients with cancer).

§

Two-sided, using the binomial distribution to assess a statistically significant difference between npl and ncl.

This is a proprietary miR from Ambion (Foster City, CA) used by Nam et al. (38).