Table 1.
Realized proportion of potential benefit from tobacco control, by year(s) | Women | Men | Overall | ||||||
Realized (NTC–ATC) | Potential (NTC–CTC) | Proportion realized | Realized (NTC–ATC) | Potential (NTC–CTC) | Proportion realized | Realized (NTC–ATC) | Potential (NTC–CTC) | Proportion realized | |
1975–2000 | |||||||||
Erasmus MC | 201 788 | 806 ,320 | 0.25 | 658 529 | 1 757 857 | 0.37 | 860 317 | 2 564 177 | 0.34 |
FHCRC | 202 817 | 862 ,610 | 0.24 | 508 777 | 1 680 867 | 0.30 | 711 594 | 2 543 477 | 0.28 |
MGH-HMS | 214 830 | 854 112 | 0.25 | 487 263 | 1 597 733 | 0.30 | 702 092 | 2 451 845 | 0.29 |
PIRE | 333 976 | 1 064 443 | 0.31 | 454 517 | 1 329 972 | 0.34 | 788 493 | 2 394 415 | 0.33 |
Rice-MDA | 285 079 | 878 359 | 0.32 | 603 236 | 1 645 651 | 0.37 | 888 316 | 2 524 010 | 0.35 |
Yale | 221 173 | 834 293 | 0.27 | 603 122 | 1 712 035 | 0.35 | 824 294 | 2 546 328 | 0.32 |
Mean | 243 277 | 883 356 | 0.28 | 552 574 | 1 620 686 | 0.34 | 795 851 | 2 504 042 | 0.32 |
1991–2000 | |||||||||
Erasmus MC | 143 273 | 462 528 | 0.31 | 384 882 | 834 310 | 0.46 | 528 155 | 1 296 837 | 0.41 |
FHCRC | 152 574 | 521 040 | 0.29 | 318 279 | 842 602 | 0.38 | 470 853 | 1 363 642 | 0.35 |
MGH-HMS | 153 549 | 511 509 | 0.30 | 310 210 | 846 300 | 0.37 | 463 759 | 1 357 809 | 0.34 |
PIRE | 253 711 | 687 156 | 0.37 | 342 558 | 865 306 | 0.40 | 596 269 | 1 552 462 | 0.38 |
Rice-MDA | 185 782 | 461 559 | 0.40 | 346 266 | 785 168 | 0.44 | 532 048 | 1 246 727 | 0.43 |
Yale | 157 388 | 507 085 | 0.31 | 366 815 | 871 273 | 0.42 | 524 203 | 1 378 358 | 0.38 |
Mean | 174 380 | 525 146 | 0.33 | 344 835 | 840 827 | 0.41 | 519 214 | 1 365 972 | 0.38 |
2000 | |||||||||
Erasmus MC | 20 277 | 55 337 | 0.37 | 48 897 | 94 979 | 0.51 | 69 173 | 150 316 | 0.46 |
FHCRC | 22 271 | 63 373 | 0.35 | 39 076 | 92 434 | 0.42 | 61 347 | 155 807 | 0.39 |
MGH-HMS | 21 532 | 60 774 | 0.35 | 38 375 | 92 187 | 0.42 | 59 907 | 152 961 | 0.39 |
PIRE | 40 496 | 90 001 | 0.45 | 50 943 | 110 800 | 0.46 | 91 439 | 200 802 | 0.46 |
Rice-MDA | 28 365 | 55 988 | 0.51 | 42 351 | 86 863 | 0.49 | 70 716 | 142 851 | 0.50 |
Yale | 23 559 | 62 628 | 0.38 | 45 165 | 96 794 | 0.47 | 68 723 | 159 422 | 0.43 |
Mean | 26 083 | 64 684 | 0.40 | 44 135 | 95 676 | 0.46 | 70 218 | 160 360 | 0.44 |
ATC = Actual Tobacco Control; CTC = Complete Tobacco Control; NTC = No Tobacco Control. The realized benefits of ATC are estimated by the difference (NTC–ATC); the potential total benefits are estimated by the difference (NTC–CTC); the proportion realized is given by the quotient of realized benefits and total potential benefits: (NTC–ATC)/(NTC–CTC). The six study groups that produced models are as follows: Erasmus MC = Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; FHCRC = Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; MGH-HMS = Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA; PIRE = Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD; Rice-MDA = Rice University and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Yale = Yale University, New Haven, CT.