Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;89(9):879–902. doi: 10.1177/0022034510375281

Table 1.

Summary of Selected Epidemiologic Observational Studies Exploring Associations between Periodontal Disease and Clinical CHD or Stroke between 2006 and 2009

Study N Country Age Range Design Exposure Outcome Adjustments Measure of Association (95% Confidence Interval)
Geismar et al., 2006 250 Denmark NA Case-control Radiographic CHD 1,2,5,6 OR 2.0 (0.77, 5.08)
Briggs et al., 2006 171 Ireland 40+ Case-control PD CHD 1–6,10 OR 3.06 (1.02–9.17)
Holmlund et al., 2006 4254 Sweden 20–70 Cross-sectional Tooth # Radiographic Self-reported CHD 1,3,5 OR 0.80 (0.64, 0.96) 2.69 (1.12, 6.46)
Rech et al., 2007 114 Brazil NR Case-control Periodontitis (clinical) ACS 1,3,6 OR 4.5 (1.3, 15.6)
Rubenfire et al., 2007 440 USA NR Case-control Positive BANA test ACS 1,3,5 OR In BANA+ participants 3.95 (1.61, 9.71)
Andriankaja et al., 2007 1461 USA 35–69 Case-control CAL Non-fatal MI 1,3,5–8 OR 1.46 (1.36, 1.69)
Gotsman et al., 2007 201 Israel NR Cross-sectional CAL (% of teeth with CAL ≥ 5) ACS 1,5,7,8 OR 1.03 (1.01, 1.04)
Nonnenmacher et al., 2007 90 Germany 40–80 Case-control CAL CHD 1–3,5,9 OR 3.2 (1.2, 9.0)
Dietrich et al., 2008* 1203 USA (NAS) 21–59 Cohort Radiographic CHD 1–10 HR 2.12 (1.26, 3.60)
USA (NAS) 60–84 Cohort Radiographic CHD 1–10 HR 1.81 (NA)
Senba et al., 2008 6816 Japan < 66 Cross-sectional Self-report periodontitis or tooth loss CHD men 1–3,5,6,8,9 OR 1.51 (0.90, 2.52) 1.54 (0.90, 2.62)
Senba et al., 2008 23,088 Japan < 66 Cross-sectional Self-report periodontitis CHD women 1–3,6,8,9 OR 1.48 (0.95, 2.32) 1.68 (1.08, 2.61)
Lund Håheim et al., 2008 1173 Norway 48–77 Case-control IgG (Aa, Pg, Td, or Tf) CHD 1–3,5–9 OR 1.31 (1.01, 1.69)
Pussinen et al., 2007b 505 Finland 25–64 Nested case-control IgA Aa
IgG Aa
IgA Pg
IgG Pg
CHD & stroke combined 1–9 HR
1.43 (0.88, 2.31)
1.64 (1.00, 2.69)
1.53 (0.95, 2.44)
1.53 (0.93, 2.50)
Tu et al., 2007 12,223 Scotland ≤ 30 Cohort Tooth loss Fatal CVD
Fatal CHD
Fatal stroke
1,3–5,8,9 HR
1.35 (1.03, 1.77)
1.19 (0.84, 1.69)
1.64 (0.96, 2.80)
Syrjala et al., 2009 392 Finland 75+ Cross-sectional Tooth loss Stroke & CHD combined 1–10 CPR (dendate vs. edentulous)***
0.9 (0.5,1.8)
Pussinen et al., 2007a 893 Finland 30–59 Nested case-control IgA Aa
IgG Aa
IgA Pg
IgG Pg
Stroke 1,2,4–10 OR 0.83 (0.62–1.10)
0.93 (0.66–1.32)
1.22 (0.91–1.65)
1.31 (0.97–1.76)
Lee et al., 2006 5123 USA (NHANES) 60+ Cross-sectional Periodontal Health Status (PHS; a composite index of periodontitis and tooth loss) Self-reported stroke 1,5,6,8,10,14 OR for PHS
Class 2-5 vs. 1
1.34 (0.75, 2.38)
1.97 (0.85, 4.56)
1.99 (1.06, 3.71)
1.56 (0.95, 2.57)
Sim et al., 2008 479 Korea 40–79 Case-control CAL Stroke** 1–6,8–10 OR 4.30 (2.27, 8.16)
Jimenez et al., 2009 1137 USA (NAS) 27–84 Cohort Radiographic Stroke 1–10 HR 3.52 (1.59, 7.81)
Pradeep et al., 2010 200 India 33–68 Case-control PD Stroke 1–3 OR 8.5 (1.1, 68.2)
You et al., 2009 22,862 USA 45+ Cross-sectional Tooth loss Stroke** 1–8 OR 1.27 (1.09, 1.49)
Choe et al., 2009 867,256 Korea 30+ Cohort Tooth loss Stroke** 1–3,5–10 HR 1.3 (1.2, 1.4)

Adjustments: 1, age; 2, race; 3, sex; 4, SES (income and/or education); 5, smoking status; 6, diabetes; 7, hyperlipidemia (or continuous LDL-cholesterol and/or HDL-cholesterol); 8, hypertension (or diastolic and/or systolic blood pressure); 9, obesity; 10, alcohol consumption. Abbreviations: PD, probing depth; CAL, clinical attachment loss; CHD, coronary heart disease; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CPR, cumulative prevalence ratio; NA, not available; NAS, Normative Aging Study, Boston, MA; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgA, immunoglobulin A; Pg, Porphyromonas gingivalis; Aa, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. *Dietrich et al. (2008) reported results only in age subgroups, so the hazard ratio for the association between radiographic periodontal disease and incident stroke among the full cohort is not available. **Hemorrhagic strokes included. ***The study by Syrjala et al. (2009) computed a cumulative prevalence ratio by comparing risk of prevalent stroke or CHD among dentate participants in the numerator with that of edentulous participants in the denominator; therefore, it can be inferred that there was a modest, non-significant increased prevalence of stroke or CHD among edentulous participants relative to dentate participants.