Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;50(4):1384–1389. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05593-11

Table 3.

Mean differences (SD) between EBV DNA loads measured by the different methods

Comparison of methodsa Mean (SD) difference between EBV DNA loads (log10 copies/ml)b
MP-Lab PCR vs Q-Lab PCR 0.11 (0.31)
Q-Lab PCR vs Q-Artus PCR −0.06 (0.42)*
Q-Lab PCR vs Q-Argene PCR −0.4 (0.41)*
Q-Artus PCR vs Q-Argene PCR −0.34 (0.49)*
a

MP, MagNA Pure extraction; Q, QIAcube extraction; Lab, laboratory-developed real-time PCR (on a LightCycler amplification platform); Artus PCR, Qiagen artus EBV RG PCR kit (on a Rotor-Gene amplification platform); Argene PCR, Argene EBV R-gene kit (on a Rotor-Gene amplification platform).

b

Asterisks indicate SD statistically different from those for MP-Lab PCR versus Q-Lab PCR (P <0.001 by the Fisher-Snedecor test).