Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2007 May 9;46(22):6525–6535. doi: 10.1021/bi700335n

Table 1.

Order tensor analysis of TAR RDCs measured under different metal conditions.

Metal Condition Stem N CN RMSD (Hz) R η ϑ × 10−3 ϑint θ (°) ξ (°)
25 mM I 13 2.9 1.1 0.99 0.27±0.04 0.48±0.04 0.56±0.05 46±4 61±50
NaCl II 11 3.1 1.1 0.99 0.11±0.07 0.88±0.04
160 mM I 15 2.9 1.3 0.99 0.15±0.03 0.57±0.03 0.67±0.05 37±7 −1±50
NaCl II 14 4.2 1.2 0.99 0.15±0.04 0.85±0.04
320 mM I 12 2.8 1.5 0.98 0.23±0.04 0.67±0.04 0.74±0.08 22±7 −18±50
NaCl II 12 4.0 1.1 0.99 0.20±0.04 0.90±0.08
4 mM I 13 2.9 1.0 0.99 0.26±0.04 0.80±0.03 0.85±0.04 17±7 −58±50
MgCl2 II 14 4.1 1.0 0.99 0.17±0.08 0.94±0.03

Shown for each helical stem are the number of RDCs (N), the condition number (CN) (69) describing the orientational spread of the RDC targeted bond vectors, the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and correlation coefficient (R) between measured and back-predicted RDCs, the order tensor asymmetry (η = |Syy−Sxx|/Szz), generalized degree of order (ϑ), internal generalized degree of order (ϑint), inter-helical bend (θ) and twist (ξ) angles. Errors are estimated using the program AFORM-RDC.