Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011 Mar;18(1):70–77. doi: 10.1007/s10880-011-9226-7

Table I.

Comparison of FP (n=279) and RS (n=124) Groups With Regard to Demographic, Psychosocial, and Clinical Variables.

Variable FP Group RS Group p-value
Age in years 56.6 (11.9) 58.0 (11.6) 0.267
Education in years 14.0 (2.8) 14.1 (3.0) 0.704
Prior # routine TVS tests 4.00 (4.7) 3.8 (4.4) 0.637
Days between Baseline and 1 Month Follow-up 32.9 (7.0) 34.5 (9.0) 0.052
IES-Total at Baseline 14.7 (14.2)  8.4 (12.1) 0.000
Personal OC Risk at Baseline 26.9 (21.6) 25.4 (24.6) 0.554
Typical OC Risk at Baseline 28.7 (18.6) 32.1 (16.7) 0.084
Comparative OC Risk at Baseline −1.8 (20.7) −6.7 (21.6) 0.033
% Previous abnormal TVS tests 24% 30% 0.160
% OC in FDR 19% 14% 0.175
% Breast Cancer in FDR 24% 21% 0.409
% Colorectal Cancer in FDR 11% 12% 0.925
% Minority  3%  2% 0.445

Note. Means and standard deviation (in parentheses) shown for age, education, # prior TVS tests, days between Baseline and 1 Month Follow-Up assessments, IES scores, and Comparative OC Risk estimates. Negative values for Comparative OC Risk indicates perceived personal OC risk is less than perceived OC risk of typical woman