Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 29;31(5):671–682. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1357-0

Table 5.

Predictive value of microbial profile for ‘ongoing infection needing relaparotomy’ in patients with culture available from index laparotomy (n = 158)

Analysis Ongoing infection needing relaparotomy (N = 49) No ongoing infection, not needing relaparotomy (N = 109) OR 95% CI P
Univariate analysis
Monomicrobiala 11 (23%) 19 (20%) 0.84 0.36–1.5 0.686
Microbial profile
 Negative culture result 2 (4%) 16 (15%) 0.25 0.06–1.12 0.070
 Coliform 12 (25%) 29 (27%) 0.90 0.41–1.95 0.779
 Gram (+) cocci 6 (12%) 12 (11%) 1.13 0.40–3.20 0.821
 Coliforms and gram (+) cocci 26 (53%) 47 (43%) 1.49 0.76–2.94 0.247
 Only anaerobes 2 (4%) 3 (3%) 1.50 0.24–9.30 0.661
Yeast present 10 (20%) 25 (23%) 0.86 0.38–1.97 0.724
Pseudomonas present 2 (4%) 11 (11%) 0.38 0.08–1.78 0.219
Amoxicilline resistant gram (+) coccib 6 (15%) 5 (5%) 3.27 0.94–11.45 0.063
Gentamicin resistant coliformsb 3 (8%) 1 (1%) 7.83 0.79–77.78 0.079
Multi drug resistanceb 31 (79%) 63 (66%) 1.36 0.60–3.06 0.465
Multivariate analysisb
 Negative culture result 2 (5%) 16 (17%) 0.29 0.06–1.35 0.189
 Amoxicilline resistant gram (+) cocci 6 (15%) 5 (5%) 3.43 0.95–12.38 0.060
 Gentamicin resistant coliforms 3 (8%) 1 (1%) 7.61 0.75–76.94 0.085
 Perforation or ischemia 23 (59%) 65 (68%) 0.67 0.30–1.52 0.342

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

a Regression analysis in 140 patients with positive culture result (47 ongoing infection, 93 no ongoing infection), since patients without growth are in neither of the categories.

b Regression analysis in 134 patients with known susceptibility or negative culture result (39 ongoing infection, 95 no ongoing infection).