Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 13;20(10):1197–1201. doi: 10.1080/09540120801926993

Table 4.

Effect of lipoatrophy on SF-8. Summary scores and item scores.

Lipoatrophy
SF-8 variables n Yes n no p-value Diff Total pop. SD CMD
Physical component summary (PCS) 190 40.58 832 45.17 <0.0001 4.585 10.626 0.431
Mental component summary (MCS) 190 37.83 832 41.54 0.0001 3.714 11.973 0.310
Daily activities (RE) 195 38.23 862 41.90 <0.0001 3.666 8.909 0.412
Emotional affect (MH) 198 38.56 866 41.40 0.0011 2.838 10.974 0.259
Energy (VT) 199 44.04 867 46.65 0.0004 2.612 9.205 0.284
General health (GH) 199 43.54 871 46.75 <0.0001 3.213 8.565 0.375
Pain (BP) 199 42.20 859 45.87 <0.0001 3.674 10.334 0.356
Physical problems (PF) 197 39.94 867 43.87 <0.0001 3.936 9.250 0.426
Social (SF) 198 38.63 861 42.81 <0.0001 4.172 9.948 0.419
Work (RP) 197 39.30 866 43.48 <0.0001 4.181 10.064 0.415

Notes: ∗CMD = Clinically meaningful differences. Patients with lipoatrophy had worse HRQL in both summary scores and in all eight individual questions, with the clinically meaningful differences ranging from 0.259–0.431 (small to medium)