Table 3.
Frequency distribution of the theoretical patterns of crisis-repair episodes
| Patterns | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 2b | 3 (3a, 3b)c | 4 (4a, 4b)d | complexe | |
| Subsample with 29-35 therapy sessions (n = 10) | |||||
| Total CREs | 12 | 2 | 17 (4, 13) | 3 (1, 2) | 1 |
| % | 34.3 | 5.7 | 48.6 (11.4, 37.1) | 8.6 (2.9, 5.7) | 2.9 |
| Courses with at least one CRE | 6 | 2 | 8 (2, 6) | 3 (1, 2) | 1 |
| Single case with 200 therapy sessions (n = 1) | |||||
| Total CREs | 16 | 0 | 13 (4, 9) | 3 (0, 3) | 2 |
| % | 47.1 | 0 | 38.2 (11.8, 26.5) | 8.8 (0, 8.8) | 5.9 |
CRE = Crisis-repair episode; % = Percentage among all CREs.
aPattern 1 = jump in - jump out; bPattern 2 = jump in - slide out; cPattern 3 = slide in - jump out; (3a) = slide in without a jump (gradual downward trend only); (3b) = slide in including a jump; dPattern 4 = slide in - slide out; (4a) = slide in without a jump (gradual downward trend only); (4b) = slide in including a jump; eComplex pattern = Two or more ruptures are intermitted through a change of direction.