Table 6.
References | Population | Landing Task | Result† | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Mean Age (years) | Double-Leg vs. Single Leg | Height (cm) | at IC | peak | RoM | |
Knee Internal Rotation Angle | |||||||
Earl et al. [23] | Adult | 22.8 | Double | 31 | --- | 0 | --- |
Kiriyama et al. [33] | Adolescent | 17.0 | Single | 20 | --- | + | --- |
Lephart et al. [34] | Adult-Athlete | 20.3 | Single | 20 | --- | 0 | --- |
Nagano et al. [35] | Adult-Athlete | 19.6 | Single | 30 | 0 | +a | --- |
TOTAL* | % (-/+/0) | 0/0/100 | 0/50/50 | --- | |||
Knee Internal Rotation Moment | |||||||
Chaudhari et al. [9] | Adult | 19.9 | Double | 30.48 | --- | 0 | --- |
Hip Internal Rotation Angle | |||||||
Earl et al. [23] | Adult | 22.8 | Double | 31 | --- | 0 | --- |
Lephart et al. [34] | Adult-Athlete | 20.3 | Single | 20 | --- | + | --- |
Hip Internal Rotation Moment | |||||||
Chaudhari et al. [9] | Adult | 19.9 | Double | 30.48 | --- | 0 | --- |
† +: greater value in female subjects; -: smaller value in female subjects; 0: no differences between sexes; ---: not investigated
a knee internal/external rotation angle at peak vertical ground reaction force
* Percentage of studies having found lower (-), greater (+), and similar (0) values in female subjects in comparison with male subjects
IC: initial ground contact; RoM: range of motion