Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec 22;19(6):1944–1953. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2174-5

Table 3.

Tumor growth pattern in colorectal cancer and patient mortality

Colorectal cancer-specific mortality
Overall mortality
Tumor growth
pattern
Total N
(%)
No. of
events
Univariate
HR
(95% CI)
Stage-
stratified HR
(95% CI)
Multivariate
stage-
stratified HR
(95% CI)
No. of
events
Univariate
HR
(95% CI)
Stage-
stratified HR
(95% CI)
Multivariate
stage-
stratified HR
(95% CI)
Expansile 372 (33%) 64 1 (referent) 1 (referent) 1 (referent) 134 1 (referent) 1 (referent) 1 (referent)
Intermediate 610 (54%) 149 1.51
(1.13-2.03)
1.22
(0.90-1.64)
1.23
(0.91-1.67)
282 1.41
(1.14-1.73)
1.27
(1.03-1.58)
1.30
(1.04-1.62)
Infiltrative 157 (14%) 95 5.37
(3.90-7.40)
1.95
(1.38-2.75)
1.74
(1.22-2.47)
112 3.64
(2.82-4.69)
1.91
(1.44-2.54)
1.78
(1.33-2.39)
 p for trend <0.0001 0.0002 0.0021 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0002

The multivariate, stage-matched (stratified) Cox regression model initially included the tumor growth pattern variable (expansile, intermediate, or infiltrative), age, sex, year of diagnosis, body mass index, tumor location, tumor differentiation, family history of colorectal cancer in any first degree relative, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, LINE-1 methylation, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, tumor differentiation, mucinous component, signet ring cell component, and peritumoral lymphocytic reaction. A backward elimination with threshold of p=0.20 was used to select variables in the final models.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.