Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):328–334. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318245cc9f

Table 2.

Comparison of relationships about the lateral most portion of the EAC.

Relationship Average Pediatric Angle (SD) Average Adult Angle (SD) P value
LatEAC:⊥TM 136.57 (1.08) 172.20 (1.15) 0.003
LatEAC:⊥RW 43.41 (1.09) 52.34 (1.17) 0.009
LatEAC:⊥FR 10.06 (0.81) 14.42 (0.87) <0.001
LatEAC:TRJ 23.51 (2.47) 19.40 (2.65) <0.001

(SD=standard deviation; LatEAC=center line of the external auditory canal; ⊥TM =line perpendicular to the tympanic membrane; ⊥RW =line perpendicular to the plane of the round window; ⊥FR =line perpendicular to the facial recess; TRJ=ideal drilling trajectory for cochleostomy)