Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Sep;14(9):993–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.06.009

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients aged 18–65 years who received a first HLA-identical sibling PBSC or BM transplants for hematologic malignancies from 1999–2003. Patients received Fludarabine + Busulfan + Thymoglobulin (cases) or Busulfan + Cyclophosphamide (controls).

CASES
FluBuTG
CONTROLS
BuCy

Characteristics of patients N eval N (%) N eval N (%) P-valuea
Number of patients 120 215
Number of centers 1 62
Age at transplant, median (range), years 120 46 (18–65) 215 44 (18–63)
    18–45 57 (48) 120 (56) 0.01
    46–65 63 (52) 95 (44)
Male sex 120 72 (60) 215 127 (59) 0.87
Matching Groups 120 215 --**
    AML, ALL, CML early(CR1, CP1)b 52 (44) 104 (48)
    AML, ALL, CML intermediate (CR2+, CP2+, AP)b 4 (3) 8 (4)
    AML, ALL, CML advanced (PIF, REL, BP)b 13 (11) 26 (12)
    MDS Treated 4 (3) 8 (4)
    MDS Untreated 18 (15) 36 (17)
    Multiple Myeloma 8 (8) 8 (4)
    NHL/HL PIF or REL 14 (12) 14 (6)
    NHL/HL CR 4 (3) 8 (4)
    CLLc 3 (2) 3 (1)
Karnofsky score prior to transplant 120 208 <0.001
    < 90 84 (70) 36 (17)
    ≥ 90 36 (30) 172 (83)
Graft type 120 215
    BM 21 (17) 87 (40) <0.001
    PBSC 99 (83) 128 (60)
Time from diagnosis to transplant, median (range), months 118 5 (<1–154) 215 6 (<1–209)
    ≤ 6 months 66 (56) 103 (48) 0.03
    > 6 months 52 (44) 112 (52)
Donor-recipient CMV status 114 204 0.25
    Negative/Negative 22 (19) 51 (25)
    At least one positive 92 (81) 153 (75)
Donor-recipient sex match 120 214 0.89
    F-M 34 (28) 63 (29)
    Otherd 86 (72) 151 (71)
GVHD prophylaxis 120 215
    MTX + CSA only 120 (100) 215 (100)
Year of transplant 120 215 <0.001
    1999–2000 44 (37) 146 (68)
    2001–2003 76 (63) 69 (32)
Year of diagnosis 118 215 0.07
    1982–1996 4 (3) 14 (7)
    1997–2003 114 (97) 201 (93)
Median follow-up of survivors, months 69 60 (16–95) 115 54 (3–93)

Abbreviations: AML=acute myelogenous leukemia; ALL=acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CLL=chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CML=chronic myelogenous leukemia; NHL=non-Hodgkin lymphoma; HL= Hodgkin lymphoma; MDS/MPS=myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorders; CR= complete remission; REL= relapse; PIF= primary induction failure; CP= chronic phase; AP= accelerated phase; BP=blast phase; CSA= cyclosporine; MTX= methotrexate; BuCy= oral busulfan + cyclophosphamide; FluBuTG= fludarabine + IV busulfan + thymoglobulin; BM= bone marrow; PBSC= peripheral blood stem cells; RIC= reduced intensity conditioning; EVAL=evaluable; CMV= cytomegalovirus virus; F=female; M=male; HLA=human leukocyte antigen.

a

The conditional logistic regression test was used for discrete covariates to detect the significant difference to for matched pair.

b
The number of CML, AML and ALL patients and disease status among the cases and controls are given below.
Disease Cases Controls
CML 21 76
      1st Chronic phase 19 69
      2nd Chronic phase - 2
      ≥ 2nd Chronic phase 2 2
      Blast phase - 3
AML 46 55
      Primary induction failure 6 10
      CR1 30 31
      CR2 2 2
      REL1 7 9
      ≥ REL2 1 3
ALL 2 6
      CR1 2 3
      CR2 - 1
      CR3 - 1
      REL1 - 1
c

The two other CLL disease statuses are RAI stage 0 and RAI stage III.

d

Other Donor-recipient sex match included: Male-Male (n=101); Male-Female (n=53); Female-Female (n=83).

**

Matched variables.