Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 6;90(4):636–647. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.020

Table 3.

Association Results of Combined-Phenotype Meta-Analysis Considering Same-Direction Effects of Alleles from COMBINED Approach

Chr SNP A1 Locus CD+PS Discovery GWAS (4,671/10,460)
PS GWAS (2,529/4,955)
CD GWAS (2,142/5,505)
PS Replication (3,187/4,759)
CD Replication (4,073/2,478)
p OR p OR p OR p OR p OR
10 rs1250544a G ZMIZ1 1.12 × 10−05 1.13 3.85 × 10−05 1.18 3.31 × 10−02 1.09 1.94 × 10−04 1.14 5.28 × 10−07 1.22
10 rs1250560b A ZMIZ1 3.13 × 10−06 0.87 4.31 × 10−06 0.82 4.87 × 10−02 0.92 1.06 × 10−03 0.87 8.06 × 10−10 0.79
10 rs1250559b A ZMIZ1 1.53 × 10−07 0.87 4.58 × 10−06 0.82 3.46 × 10−02 0.91 1.16 × 10−03 0.87 4.10 × 10−10 0.79
16 rs4780355a T SOCS1 9.36 × 10−07 1.16 1.72 × 10−04 1.18 1.47 × 10−03 1.15 7.53 × 10−04 1.14 7.40 × 10−06 1.19

The following abbreviations are used: Chr: chromosome of marker; SNP: rs ID; A1: minor allele; Locus: one candidate gene in the region; p/OR: p value and corresponding odds ratio with respect to minor allele for the combined-phenotype GWAS meta-analysis of CD and PS (panels A and B), GWAS meta-analysis of PS (panel A), GWAS meta-analysis of CD (panel B), PS replication analysis (as part of panel D), CD replication analysis (part of panel D, panel E). For each panel, numbers of cases/controls are displayed in parentheses. None of the SNPs showed an exact Hardy-Weinberg p value < 0.01 in the PS and CD replication panels (panels D and E).

a

SNPs were identified via genotype imputation based on the HapMap3 reference and P/OR are given according to that analysis.

b

SNPs were identified via genotype imputation based on the 1000 Genomes reference and P/OR are given according to that analysis.