Table 1.
Overview of the 20 studies and peak coordinates used in the ALE analysis.
| Number | Reference | Number of patients | MNI coordinates | Class | Description lesion mapping result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molenberghs and Sale, 2011 | 44 | 31, −77, 37 | B | Cancellation task |
| 34, −74, 34 | A | Line bisection task | |||
| 2 | Mort et al., 2003 | 35 | 51, −42, 31 | C | MCA neglect patients |
| 36, −10, 18 | C | PCA neglect patients | |||
| 3 | Karnath et al., 2004 | 140 | 67, −18, 5 | C | Neglect vs. non-neglect patients |
| 4 | Verdon et al., 2010 | 80 | 29, −29, 18 | C | Neglect on all tasks |
| 20, −2, 30 | C | ||||
| 33, −47, 37 | A | Perceptive/visuo-spatial egocentric neglect | |||
| 28, −60, 28 | A | ||||
| 49, 29, 15 | B | Exploratory/visuo-motor egocentric neglect | |||
| 38, 49, 8 | B | ||||
| 52, 2, 33 | B | ||||
| 35, −26, −10 | D | Allocentric neglect | |||
| 5 | Committeri et al., 2007 | 52 | 64, 4, 16 | C | Extrapersonal neglect |
| 44, 44, 20 | C | ||||
| 60, −24, 4 | C | ||||
| 50, −28, −8 | C | ||||
| 37, 6, −20 | C | ||||
| 37, −36, 32 | E | Personal neglect | |||
| 40, −19, 39 | E | ||||
| 56, −29, 40 | E | ||||
| 35, 13, 38 | E | ||||
| 6 | Golay et al., 2008 | 19 | 24, 26, 8 | C | Neglect minus non-neglect patients |
| 40, −44, 26 | C | ||||
| 7 | Chechlacz et al., 2010 | 41 | 54, −58, 6 | D | Allocentric neglect |
| 50, −58, 44 | D | ||||
| 50, −62, 30 | D | ||||
| 52, −32, 40 | B | Egocentric neglect | |||
| 48, −24, −8 | B | ||||
| 44, −8, 62 | B | ||||
| 4, −22, −2 | B | ||||
| 16, 8, −10 | B | ||||
| 50, −38, 18 | C | Allocentric and egocentric neglect | |||
| 50, −22, 40 | C | ||||
| 8 | Vossel et al., 2011 | 56 | 52, −72, 33 | F | Visual extinction |
| 41, −77, 18 | C | Unilateral left performance (p.c.) | |||
| 44, −71, 38 | C | ||||
| 37, 6, 43 | C | ||||
| 26, −17, 53 | C | ||||
| 39, −77, 13 | A | Line bisection task (p.c.) | |||
| 37, 45, 28 | A | ||||
| 41, 39, 33 | B | Cancellation task (p.c.) | |||
| 31, 12, 53 | B | ||||
| 28, −41, 53 | B | ||||
| 9 | Grimsen et al., 2008 | 21 | 37, −26, 60 | C | Egocentric impairment |
| 40, 2, 57 | C | ||||
| 35, −7, 49 | C | ||||
| 37, −19, 50 | C | ||||
| 38, −9, −13 | D | Allocentric impairment | |||
| 10 | Mannan et al., 2005 | 8 | 42, −53, 43 | C | MCA neglect patients |
| 11 | Urbanski et al., 2011 | 12 | 34, 8, 22 | C | neglect patients vs. non-neglect patients |
| 12 | Molenberghs et al., 2008 | 20 | 43, −67, 33 | F | More interference from an ipsilesional distractor (p.c.) |
| 13 | Shallice et al., 2010 | 42 | 34, −48, 29 | B | Cancellation task (p.c.) |
| 14 | Karnath et al., 2003 | 27 | 69, −9, 0 | C | Neglect |
| 65, −35, 34 | F | Extinction | |||
| 63, −55, 27 | F | ||||
| 67, −49, 8 | F | ||||
| 69, −34, 7 | F | ||||
| 15 | Eschenbeck et al., 2010 | 68 | 26, −4, 58 | C | Neuropsychological (NP) neglect test battery (p.c.) |
| 29, −38, 53 | C | ||||
| 16 | Doricchi and Tomaiuolo, 2003 | 21 | 39, −8, 26 | C | All neglect patients minus controls |
| 30, −5, 35 | C | ||||
| 17 | Baas et al., 2011 | 22 | 47, −42, 20 | E | Patients with minus without personal neglect |
| 18 | Ptak and Schnider, 2010 | 29 | 30, −22, 22 | C | Neglect patients minus control patients |
| 27, 3, 30 | C | ||||
| 44, −46, 32 | C | ||||
| 19 | Rengachary et al., 2011 | 30 | 28, −10, 22 | C | Consistent lesion site in neglect patients (p.c.) |
| 20 | Medina et al., 2009 | 171 | 28, −27, 28 | D | Stimulus-centered neglect (p.c.) |
| 55, −21, 13 | C | Viewer-centered neglect (p.c.) |
Class A = neglect tested with line bisection task, B = neglect tested with cancellation task, C = neglect tested in general, D = allocentric neglect, E = personal neglect and F = spatial extinction. p.c. = coordinates obtained through personal communication.