Table 2. Relationships between clinic-pathological factors and cancer-specific survival, in patients selected for potentially curative resection for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n=98).
Univariate analysis
|
Multivariate analysis
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
Patient-related factors | ||||
Age (<65/65–74/⩾75 years) | 1.69 (1.11–2.59) | 0.016 | 1.93 (1.23–3.04) | 0.004 |
Sex (male/female) | 0.47 (0.17–1.31) | 0.148 | ||
mGPS (0/1/2) | 2.39 (1.36–4.18) | 0.002 | 2.91 (1.51–5.62) | 0.001 |
Tumour-related factors | ||||
TNM stage (I/II/III) | 2.27 (1.42–3.64) | 0.001 | 0.345 | |
Tumour differentiation (well-mod/poor) | 2.52 (1.43–4.44) | 0.001 | 0.202 | |
Resection margin (R0/R1) | 1.80 (0.99–3.29) | 0.053 | 0.805 | |
Positive to total lymph node ratio (0/⩽0.2/>0.2) | 2.47 (1.71–3.58) | <0.001 | 2.38 (1.60–3.52) | <0.001 |
Neo-adjuvant therapy (no/yes) | 1.39 (0.74–2.61) | 0.304 | ||
Adjuvant therapy (no/yes) | 1.74 (0.83–3.65) | 0.141 | ||
Klintrup–Makinen score (low/high grade) | 0.35 (0.15–0.82) | 0.016 | 0.076 | |
Necrosis score (low/high grade) | 1.12 (0.64–1.97) | 0.695 | ||
CD8 tertiles | 0.69 (0.48–0.99) | 0.048 | 0.697 | |
CD68 tertiles | 1.38 (0.99–1.94) | 0.061 | 1.49 (1.02–2.18) | 0.041 |
Ki67 tertiles | 1.46 (1.01–2.12) | 0.048 | 0.479 | |
CD34 tertiles | 0.94 (0.67–1.34) | 0.736 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; LNR=lymph node ratio; mGPS=modified Glasgow Prognostic score; TNM=tumour node metastasis.