Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;10(6):1030–1037. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.030852

Table 5. Case-case comparisons of community SARS patients, Guangdong, China, November 2002–April 2003, according to contact history and onset datea.

Exposure (in previous 2 weeks) No contact history (n = 406)
Contact history (n = 103 )
Early onsetb (n = 19)c
Late onsetb (n = 387)c
Yes No Yes No OR (95% CI) Yes No Yes No OR (95% CI)
Visited hospital 17 70 22 13 6.83 (2.89 to 6.73) 0 10 45 169 0.00 (0.00 to 1.36)
Visited by a friend 4 71 1 17 1.04 (0.04 to 8.93) 0 1 4 70 0.00 (0.00 to 337)
Regular hand washing 122 15 44 3 1.80 (0.53 to 8.10) 4 1 118 14 0.48 (0.06 to 12.55)
Travel history 45 179 13 62 0.83 (0.41 to 1.63) 0 10 45 169 0.00 (0.00 to 1.36)
Animal contact 37 262 13 56 1.64 (0.80 to 3.25) 1 3 36 259 2.39 (0.09 to 23.02)
Visited produce market 9 79 1 19 0.41 (0.02 to 2.75) 0 1 9 69 0.00 (0.00 to 148)
Lives near produce market 89 169 19 43 0.84 (0.45 to 1.52) 5 0 84 169 Undef. (2.39 to Undef.)
Lives near poultry or livestock farm 6 252 3 59 2.13 (0.42 to 8.81) 0 19 6 247 0.00 (0.00 to 40.15)

aSARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
bDefined as November 1, 2002–January 31, 2003 for early onset; February 1, 2003–April 30, 2003 for late onset.
cCases with no contact history and for whom case investigation data are available.