Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;10(6):1023–1029. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.030716

Table 3. Percentage recovery of premoistened swabs.

Recovery method Mean Median SD Range 95% CIa pb
All swabs
All 14.3 9.4 14.9 0.4–63.9 11.2 to 17.4
Extractionc 19.7 14.4 15.5 4.8–63.9 16.3 to 23.1
2.5 to 4.4 < 0.01
No extraction 3.5 2.7 3.1 0.4–13.5
Vortex 26.7 23.7 18.9 1.4–29.0 20.8 to 32.6
11.0 to 14.5 < 0.01
Sonication 12.7 13.0 5.6 4.8–63.9
Cotton swabs
All 20.0 13.3 18.1 2.6–62.5 13.5 to 26.5
Extraction 27.7 20.0 17.7 7.3–62.5 16.7 to 38.7
3.3 to 6.1 < 0.01
No extraction 4.7 4.0 2.2 2.6–9.7
Vortex 41.7 43.7 14.6 23.9–62.5 33.7 to 51.8
11.3 to 15.3 < 0.01
Sonication 13.6 13.3 3.2 7.3–19.5
Macrofoam swabs
All 22.5 16.7 17.5 1.8–63.9 16.3 to 28.8
Extraction 30.7 29.7 15.9 7.0–63.9 20.8 to 40.5
3.9 to 8.7 < 0.01
No Extraction 6.3 6.5 3.9 1.8–13.5
Vortex 43.6 44.9 11.1 30.4–64.0 36.8 to 50.5
14.0 to 21.3 < 0.01
Sonication 17.7 16.7 5.9 7.0–29.0
Polyester swabs
All 7.7 6.4 5.3 0.5–16.5 5.8 to 9.6
Extraction 10.6 11.1 4.1 4.8–16.5 8.1 to 13.1
1.4 to 2.5 1.0
No Extraction 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.5–3.4
Vortex 9.9 10.0 3.8 4.8–14.4 7.5 to 12.3
8.5 to 13.9 1.0
Sonication 11.2 12.3 4.4 4.8–16.5
Rayon swabs
All 7.0 6.0 6.8 0.4–24.0 4.6 to 9.4
Extraction 10.0 8.1 6.4 1.4–24.1 6.0 to 14.0
0.5 to 1.4 1.0
No extraction 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.4–2.9
Vortex 11.5 11.5 7.9 1.4–24.1 6.6 to 11.2
5.7 to 11.3 1.0
Sonication 8.5 7.5 4.4 2.5–18.9

aCI, confidence interval.
bAdjusted for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni correction.
cVortex and sonication methods combined.