Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-33

Table 2.

Adjusted regression model results

Gene region of interest ART group SC group Difference
Estimatec
95% CI p-value
Na Meanb Na Meanb
Lymphocyte samples

KvDMR 52 47.61 27 47.53 0.72 (-1.00, 2.45) 0.41

H19 CTCF3 53 42.16 27 41.70 0.66 (-0.94, 2.25) 0.42

H19 CTCF6 52 38.07 27 35.15 0.93 (-1.79, 3.65) 0.50

IGF2DMR0 53 50.04 26 48.32 0.08 (-1.82, 1.98) 0.94

IGF2R 52 69.26 27 72.13 -4.41 (-9.49, 0.66) 0.09

Buccal samples

KvDMR 64 53.46 29 52.60 1.60 (-2.77, 5.98) 0.47

H19 CTCF3 65 42.94 29 43.09 -0.24 (-2.96, 2.48) 0.86

H19 CTCF6 65 38.37 28 37.48 1.38 (-2.89, 5.64) 0.53

IGF2DMR0 65 36.52 27 35.03 2.07 (-0.28, 4.42) 0.08

IGF2R 65 79.45 29 81.35 -2.79 (-5.74, 0.16) 0.06

a Number of subjects included in the analysis

b The reported mean is averaged over all CpG sites in the region of interest

c Adjusted for pyrosequencing run, child's age, child's birth weight, child's sex, maternal age, maternal education, and household income