Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 12;116(5):679–686. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268862

Table 2.

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics

Characteristic All treated patients, N = 66 Phase 2 population, n = 35
Median age, y (range) 58 (22-86) 59 (22-86)
Male sex, n (%) 36 (55) 19 (54)
Race, n (%)
    White 53 (80) 27 (77)
    Black 11 (17) 7 (20)
    Other 2 (3) 1 (3)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
    0 43 (65) 17 (49)
    1 17 (26) 13 (37)
    2 6 (9) 5 (14)
ISS stage at treatment initiation, n (%)
    I 29 (44) 12 (34)
    II 31 (47) 19 (54)
    III 6 (9) 4 (11)
Durie-Salmon stage at diagnosis, n (%)*
    I 22 (33) 9 (26)
    II 21 (32) 13 (37)
    III 23 (35) 13 (37)
MM subtype, n (%)
    IgG 45 (68) 20 (57)
    IgA 15 (23) 11 (31)
    Light chain 6 (9) 4 (11)
β2-microglobulin level, n (%)
    < 3.5 mg/L 44 (67) 19 (54)
    3.5-5.5 mg/L 17 (26) 13 (37)
    > 5.5 mg/L 5 (8) 3 (9)
Albumin level, n (%)
    < 3.5 g/dL 24 (36) 17 (49)
    ≥ 3.5 g/dL 42 (64) 18 (51)
Elevated LDH, n (%) 6 (9) 4 (11)
Lytic lesions, n (%)
    None 16 (24) 5 (14)
    1-3 bones 15 (23) 10 (29)
    > 3 bones 34 (52) 19 (54)
Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics, n (%) 6 (9) 2 (6)
FISH abnormalities,n (%)
    Del 13q 24 (47) 16 (53)
    Del 17p 5 (10) 2 (7)
    t(4;14) 2 (5) 2 (9)
    t(11;14) 11 (22) 7 (23)
    Del 17p and/or t(4;14) 6 (12) 3 (8)

ECOG indicates Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ISS, International Staging System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; and MM, multiple myeloma.

*

All patients were symptomatic at enrollment/treatment initiation.

Data missing for 1 patient in the phase 2 population.

Numbers of patients with results for del 13q, del 17p, t(4;14), and t(11;14) status were 51, 50, 41, and 51, respectively, for the overall population, and 30, 30, 22, and 30 for the phase 2 population. N values for analyses of “Del 17p and/or t(4;14)” were 50 for the overall population and 36 for the phase 2 population. A patient was determined to have abnormal cytogenetics if, when FISH was used, the percentage of nuclei consistent with these cytogenetic abnormalities exceeded the normal ranges established for the respective probes in the cytogenetics laboratory of each participating institution.